Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

Understanding Excepted Benefits Under the Affordable Care Act

Many employers offer benefits packages that provide employees with more than just health insurance coverage. Though some of these benefits, like pre-paid legal service plans, are clearly not health-related, others may provide employees with some health-related benefits. Does this mean they are subject to the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance market reforms? Not necessarily.

Certain types of benefits, due to their nature, are not subject to a number of health-related laws, including the Affordable Care Act, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the Mental Health Parity Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. These are known as excepted benefits.

There are four categories of excepted benefits.

Benefits Excepted In All Circumstances

The following benefits, or any combination thereof, are considered excepted benefits in all circumstances:

Coverage only for accident (including accidental death and dismemberment)
Disability income coverage
Liability insurance, including general liability and automobile insurance
Coverage issued as a supplement to liability insurance
Workers’ compensation or similar coverage
Automobile medical payment insurance
Credit-only insurance (for example, mortgage insurance)
Coverage for on-site medical clinics

Limited Excepted Benefits

A number of benefits may be considered excepted benefits if they are provided under a separate policy, certificate or contract of insurance. They can also qualify as a limited excepted benefit if they are not an integral part of a group health plan, which means that participants may decline coverage or that claims for benefits are administered under a separate contract than claims for any other benefits under the plan.

One or more of the following benefits may qualify as a limited excepted benefit:

Limited-scope dental benefits
Limited-scope vision benefits
Long-term care benefits
Health flexible spending arrangements
Employee assistance programs (EAPs)

Noncoordinated Excepted Benefits

Coverage for only a specified disease or illness, such as a cancer-only policy, may qualify as a noncoordinated excepted benefit. Hospital indemnity or other fixed indemnity insurance may also qualify if it pays a fixed dollar amount per day (or per other period) of hospitalization or illness regardless of the amount of expenses incurred.

To qualify as a noncoordinated excepted benefit:

Benefits must be provided under a separate policy, certificate or contract of insurance;
There is no coordination between the benefits provided and an exclusion of benefits under any group health plan maintained by the same employer; and
Benefits are paid regardless of whether benefits are provided under any group health plan maintained by the same employer.

Supplemental Excepted Benefits

The following benefits may qualify as supplemental excepted benefits if they are provided under a separate policy, certificate or contract of insurance:

Medicare supplemental health insurance (Medigap or MedSupp insurance);
Coverage supplemental to the managed health care program established by the Department of Defense (TRICARE); and
Similar supplemental coverage specifically designed to fill gaps in primary coverage, such as coinsurance or deductibles, but which does not include coverage that becomes secondary or supplemental only under a coordination-of-benefits provision.

Excepted benefits must satisfy a number of specific requirements set forth in the federal regulations. Employers should consult a knowledgeable and licensed professional before taking action or making changes to their benefits packages.

If you would like more information about excepted benefits or would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help with your employee benefits package, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

Affordable Care Act Update

Despite becoming law over four years ago, the Affordable Care Act continues to make headlines. Since it’s not easy to keep track of all the changes, let’s take a look at some of the more significant recent developments.

Elimination of Small Group Deductible Limits

A significant ACA change scheduled to take effect in 2014 involves annual deductible limits for small groups. Under this provision, small group health plan deductibles could not be more than $2,000 for individuals or $4,000 for families. Those who were concerned about the lack of flexibility caused by these deductible limits no longer have to worry.

The small group deductible limits were rather unceremoniously eliminated by the Protecting Access to Medicare Act, which was signed into law on April 1, 2014. Since these limits were retroactively eliminated back to the day the ACA was originally enacted, it’s almost like they never existed. This is welcome news for many small groups, which are typically those employers with up to 50 employees, but which may be employers with up to 100 employees.

However, it is important to note that the ACA’s annual out-of-pocket cost-sharing limits have not changed. Since these cost-sharing limits specifically apply to deductibles, among other things, employers must still be aware of indirect deductible limitations. The 2014 annual out-of-pocket limit is $6,350 for individuals and $12,700 for families.

Updated Model COBRA Notices

Under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA), employees and their families may have the option of staying on their former employer’s health insurance plan for a limited period of time after their employment ends. Despite having to pay the entire premium, including any portion previously paid by their employer, COBRA coverage has typically been cheaper than individual or family coverage because the premiums are based on the employer’s group rates. However, with the new Health Insurance Marketplace created by the ACA, this may no longer be the case.

Phyllis C. Borzi, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employee Benefits Security, said that, “in many cases, workers eligible for COBRA continuation coverage can save significant sums of money by instead purchasing health insurance through the Marketplace…It is important that workers know that in some cases there is a Marketplace option as well.”

To let employees know they may have an alternative to continuing their health care coverage under COBRA, the Department of Labor updated its Model COBRA General Notice and Model COBRA Election Notice. According to the Department of Labor, these updated notices make it clear to workers that if they are eligible for COBRA continuation coverage when leaving a job, they may choose to instead purchase coverage through the Health Insurance Marketplace.

Employer Mandate

In February 2014, the Internal Revenue Service provided transition relief from the ACA’s employer responsibility provisions. Employers with 100 or more employees wanting to avoid the penalty must offer coverage to 70% of their full-time employees in 2015, and 95% in 2016 and beyond. Large employers that do not meet these standards will have to make employer responsibility payments beginning in 2015. Employers with 50 to 99 full time employees will not be subject to a penalty until 2016, provided they meet certain conditions.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the changes coming in 2014. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

Offering Health Insurance to Same-Sex Spouses

Under the Affordable Care Act, health insurance issuers in the individual and group markets are generally required to guarantee insurance coverage to every employer and individual that applies. Beginning in 2015, this guarantee will extend to same-sex spouses.

On March 14, 2014, the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) announced that insurance companies offering non-grandfathered health insurance plans can no longer refuse to offer health insurance coverage to same-sex spouses. In taking this position, the HHS relied on federal regulations prohibiting health insurance issuers from employing marketing practices or benefit designs that discriminate on the basis of, among other things, an individual’s sexual orientation.

According to HHS, an issuer is considered to employ discriminatory marketing practices or benefit designs if the issuer:

Offers health insurance coverage to a spouse in an opposite-sex marriage; and
Does not offer the same coverage to a spouse in a same-sex marriage that was validly consummated in a jurisdiction where the law authorizes same-sex marriages.

Importantly, the prohibition against discriminating against same-sex spouses applies regardless of the jurisdiction in which the insurance policy is offered, sold, issued, renewed, in effect, or operated, and regardless of where the policyholder resides. This means that insurance companies must offer coverage to legally married same-sex spouses even if they live in a state that does not allow same-sex marriages.

HHS noted that its position regarding coverage for same-sex spouses does not require a group health plan to provide coverage that is inconsistent with the terms of eligibility for coverage under the plan, or that otherwise interferes with the ability of a plan sponsor to define a dependent spouse for purposes of eligibility for coverage under the plan. It only prohibits an issuer from refusing to offer the option to cover same-sex spouses on the same terms and conditions as opposite sex-spouses.

According to HHS, it is only clarifying the current regulations’ prohibition against discrimination based on sexual orientation in a manner that is consistent with the policy of ensuring that all individuals have access to health coverage. However, since “some issuers may not have understood the prohibition,” HHS is not requiring immediate compliance. Rather, health insurance issuers must implement changes for plans or policies years beginning on or after January 1, 2015.

Though fewer than half the states allow same-sex marriages, employers in every state need to be aware of health insurance requirements for same-sex spouses. Beginning in 2015, the focus will need to be on the legality of the marriage rather than the gender of the spouses.

Recent developments with the Affordable Care Act suggest that change rather than stability should be expected. At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the changes coming in 2014 and beyond. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act.

If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you would like to subscribe to our newsletters please click here.

Affordable Care Act’s Employer Mandate Delayed…Again

On February 10, 2014, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued final regulations implementing the employer responsibility provisions under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Despite being previously delayed, the final regulations provide transition relief to employers with 50 or more employees, which, according to the administration, should ensure a gradual phase-in of the employer mandate.

Since the employer mandate does not apply to employers with fewer than 50 employees, small employers are not required to provide coverage or fill out any forms in 2015, or in any year, under the ACA. For employers with 50 or more full-time employees, the final regulations provide the following transition relief.

Large Employers (100 or more employees): The final regulations reduce the percentage of full-time employees that must be offered health coverage. To avoid paying a penalty, large employers must offer coverage to 70% of their full-time employees in 2015, and 95% in 2016 and beyond. Large employers that do not meet these standards will have to make employer responsibility payments beginning in 2015.

Medium Employers (50 to 99 employees): The employer responsibility provisions will not apply to employers with 50 to 99 full-time employees until 2016. However, to be eligible for this transition relief, employers must certify that they meet the following conditions:

Limited Workforce Size. The employer must employ an average of at least 50 but fewer than 100 full-time employees (including full-time equivalents) on business days during 2014. The number of full-time employees (including full-time equivalents) is determined in accordance with the otherwise applicable rules in the final regulations for determining status as an applicable large employer.
Maintenance of Workforce and Aggregate Hours of Service. From February 9, 2014 to December 31, 2014, the employer may not reduce the size of its workforce or the overall hours of service of its employees in order to qualify for the transition relief. However, an employer that reduces workforce size or overall hours of service for bona fide business reasons is still eligible for the relief.
Maintenance of Previously Offered Health Coverage. From February 9, 2014 to December 31, 2015 (or, for employers with non-calendar-year plans, the last day of the 2015 plan year), the employer does not eliminate or materially reduce the health coverage, if any, it offered as of February 9, 2014. An employer will generally not be treated as eliminating or materially reducing health coverage if: (i) the employer contributes at least 95 percent of the dollar amount or at least the same percentage of the cost of coverage that was offered on February 9, 2014; (ii) any changes in benefits to employee-only coverage continue to provide minimum value; and (iii) the employer does not narrow or reduce the classes of employees (or the employees’ dependents) to whom coverage under was offered on February 9, 2014.

Since the final regulations cover a number of different topics and are highly technical, employers looking to take advantage of the transition relief should consult with a licensed professional.

Though many welcome the transition relief provided in the final regulations, it doesn’t look like 2014 will bring stability and predictability to health care under the Affordable Care Act. At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the changes coming in 2014. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

Protecting Valuable Business Papers and Records

Businesses often prepare an inventory of valuable property to simplify the process of filing an insurance claim in the event of a loss. For some reason, papers and records rarely make the list, even though losing these documents could disrupt business operations. Fortunately, insurance is available to cover the unbudgeted and often significant costs of dealing with a loss of business papers and records.

Valuable Papers and Records (VPR) coverage is a type of property insurance that covers the cost to research, replace or restore information that is lost when papers and records are damaged or destroyed. This insurance generally covers papers and records owned by the insured or in the insured’s care, custody and control, and it is often found in property insurance and small business owners’ policies. Large or unique risks may require a separate, stand-alone policy.

Notably, since VPR covers the cost of reproduction, it is not intended to protect items that cannot be replaced or duplicated because they will only be valued at the cost of blank material of substantially identical type. So, if an original Declaration of Independence is lost, the insurer will cover the cost of a blank piece of paper. To ensure maximum protection, irreplaceable items must be listed separately under the policy and possibly appraised so their value can be determined. In some cases, a separate insurance policy may be necessary.

VPR coverage is ideal for most businesses, including:

accountants
law firms
architects and engineers
physicians and medical offices
businesses that regularly produce and rely on important documents, such as files, receipts, invoices, lists, contracts, etc.

When shopping for VPR coverage, it is important to know what the policy does and does not cover. Although definitions may vary, ‘Valuable Papers and Records’ are generally defined to include documents, manuscripts and records that are inscribed, printed or written, including abstracts, books, deeds, drawings, films, maps and mortgages.

VPR policies do not typically cover money or securities. Importantly, once papers and records are reduced to electronic format or saved on some form of electronic media (CDs, hard drives, tapes, disks, etc.), they are generally excluded from coverage under a VPR policy, and need to be insured under an Electronic Data Processing policy.

The cause of the direct physical loss or damage to the papers and records must be a covered loss under the policy. Losses caused by errors in processing or copying, earth movement, war, neglect, nuclear hazard and various events involving water are typically not covered. Since even the broadest policy forms have exclusions, it is important to review them carefully.

Coverage limits should be enough to cover the cost of replacing or reconstructing lost information through research or transcription from other sources. While VPR generally covers items kept at the premises listed on the policy’s declarations, papers and records kept at an unlisted location may be subject to a lower limit (sub-limit) or may be excluded from coverage altogether. Make sure the policy lists all locations where papers and records may be stored.

In addition to VPR insurance, businesses may consider storing papers and records in a facility with the reputation, amenities and expertise needed to offer maximum protection. According to Carlos Diaz of Value Store it, “Not all storage facilities offer a comprehensive approach to this risk. Not all solutions are the same.” Some additional services to look for in a storage facility include:

Professional and responsive staff
Physical features/amenities (fire and security system, climate control, etc.)
Experience in handling and storing similar papers and records
Comprehensive Solutions (digitizing, e-filing, bulk shredding, etc.)
Ability to comply with applicable laws (HIPAA, Gramm-Leach-Bliley, etc.)

Be sure to visit the storage facility and check references, and before moving in, confirm coverage by checking the VPR policy. If it has lower limits for papers and records stored off-premises or excludes coverage altogether, the storage facility may need to be added to the list of covered locations.

Though protecting against the loss of papers and records is rarely high on the list of priorities, it should be. Those who underestimate the importance of papers and records may one day recognize they are not just valuable, they are invaluable.

If you would like to learn more about protecting your valuable papers and records, please contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

Department of Health Issues Final HIPAA and HITECH Act Rules

On January 25, 2013, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published its omnibus Final Rule regarding the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA).

According to HHS, the Final Rule “greatly enhances a patient’s privacy protections, provides individuals new rights to their health information, and strengthens the government’s ability to enforce the law.” Here is a brief summary of some of the Final Rule’s provisions.

Breach Notification Standard

Previously, an incident involving the impermissible use or disclosure of protected health information (PHI) was generally not considered a breach unless an internal risk assessment revealed a significant risk of harm to those whose information was compromised. Under the Final Rule, an impermissible use or disclosure of PHI is presumed to be a breach unless an internal risk assessment demonstrates that there is a low probability that the PHI has been compromised.

Although the Final Rule keeps the risk assessment requirement, it is more structured and objective than before. It requires a covered entity to consider:

The nature and extent of the PHI involved, including the types of identifiers and the likelihood of re-identification;
The unauthorized person who used the PHI or to whom the disclosure was made;
Whether the PHI was actually acquired or viewed; and
The extent to which the risk to the PHI has been mitigated.

Modifications to HIPAA Required by the HITECH Act

The Final Rule implements previous proposed and interim rules regarding HIPAA modifications required by the HITECH Act. These modifications:

Make business associates of covered entities directly liable for compliance with various requirements of HIPAA’s Privacy and Security Rules.
Strengthen the limitations on the use and disclosure of PHI for marketing and fundraising purposes, and prohibit the sale of PHI without individual authorization.
Expand individuals’ rights to receive electronic copies of their health information and to restrict disclosures to a health plan concerning treatment for which the individual has paid out of pocket in full.
Require modifications to, and redistribution of, a covered entity’s notice of privacy practices.
Modify the individual authorization and other requirements to facilitate research and disclosure of child immunization proof to schools, and to enable access to decedent information by family members or others.
Adopt additional HITECH Act enhancements to HIPAA’s Enforcement Rule that were not previously implemented, such as the provisions addressing enforcement of noncompliance with HIPAA due to willful neglect.

Genetic Information

The Final Rule modifies the HIPAA Privacy Rule as required by GINA to prohibit health plans, but not long-term care policies, from using or disclosing genetic information for underwriting purposes. It also clarifies that “health information” includes genetic information.

The effective date of the Final Rule is March 26, 2013, and the compliance date for covered entities and business associates is September 23, 2013. Since much of the Final Rule merely implements previously issued non-final rules, many covered entities and business associates should find that they are already in compliance.

Covered entities and business associates should consider insuring against the substantial costs associated with a security breach. Various insurance products protect against privacy injuries resulting from security breaches, such as identity theft. Insurance may also help cover the significant cost of complying with applicable breach notification laws like those discussed above. Given the variety and complexity of these products, an experienced insurance agent should be consulted to ensure that proper coverage is obtained and that no gaps remain.

If you would like to learn more about insuring against data security breaches, contact us.

Additionally, clients of Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk enjoy access to various risk management services such as our affiliate’s HIPAA Standards Training which has been approved by the HR Certification Institute as well as the Florida Bar.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.