Guide to the Affordable Care Act – Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk

Gender Identity and Sex Stereotyping Under the Affordable Care Act

Did you know that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) contains a civil rights provision? The ACA prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability in certain health programs and activities. Despite becoming law in 2010, final implementation rules were not issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) until May 2016. On July 18, 2016, the Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities final rule went into effect.

Under the ACA, individuals cannot be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any covered health program or activity on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability. Though the final rule generally incorporates existing federal nondiscrimination laws and policies , provisions dealing with sex discrimination, primarily gender identity and sex stereotyping, are getting the most attention.

The final rule states that sex discrimination includes discrimination based on sex, pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions. Individuals cannot be denied health care based on their sex and women and men must be treated equally in terms of health care and insurance coverage. However, the final rule also prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sex stereotyping.

Gender identity is an individual’s internal sense of gender. It may be male, female, neither, or a combination of both. An individual’s gender identity may be different from the sex they were assigned at birth. A transgender individual is an individual whose gender identity is different from the sex assigned to that person at birth.

Sex stereotypes are stereotypical notions of masculinity or femininity. They include expectations of how individuals represent or communicate their gender to others and that individuals will consistently identify with and conform to stereotypes associated with their assigned gender. Sex stereotypes also include gendered expectations related to the appropriate roles of a certain sex.

According to HHS, categorical coverage exclusions or limitations for all health care services related to gender transition are discriminatory. Individuals must be treated in a manner consistent with their gender identity. Providers may not deny or limit treatment that is ordinarily or exclusively available to individuals of one gender because the person seeking treatment identifies as belonging to another gender.

The manner in which the final rule expanded the traditional scope of sex discrimination to include gender identity and sex stereotyping represents a fairly significant policy shift. However, HHS admits that the final rule does not resolve whether discrimination on the basis of an individual’s sexual orientation alone violates the ACA’s nondiscrimination provision. Nevertheless, HHS states that allegations of sexual orientation discrimination will be evaluated by the Office for Civil Rights to determine whether they involve the sorts of stereotyping that violate the ACA’s nondiscrimination provision.

Despite not being directly covered by the ACA’s nondiscrimination rules, many employers will be affected indirectly. Employers providing fully insured group health plans may be affected because their insurance companies are covered by the rule. Employers using a covered third-party administrator to manage their self-fund group plan may also be affected by the rule. Consequently, employers should have at least a basic understanding of the ACA’s nondiscrimination rules.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the constantly changing health care landscape and offer a number of valuable risk management solutions to help you properly and efficiently manage your employee benefits, group health and business insurance programs.

Please contact us if you would like more information about complying with the Affordable Care Act or subscribe to our weekly risk mangement newsletter.

Supreme Court Requests Compromise Options in ACA Contraception Case

In Zubik v. Burwell, the U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether the rights of religiously affiliated nonprofit organizations are violated by the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive-coverage mandate. Given the sensitive, often contentious issues raised in this case, the public is anxiously awaiting the Court’s decision. However, many were surprised when less than a week after hearing oral arguments, the Court ordered the parties to provide potential compromise solutions.

The ACA generally requires group health insurance plans to cover preventive care and screenings for women without cost sharing elements (copayment, coinsurance, deductible), including all contraceptive methods approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Though generally mandatory for nonprofit employers with no religious affiliation and for-profit employers that are not closely-held (the Hobby Lobby case), religious and religiously affiliated employers can avoid the contraceptive-coverage mandate, either by exemption or accommodation.

Exemption. Federal regulations authorize an exemption for nonprofit religious employers, including churches and their integrated auxiliaries. These employers are not bound by the contraceptive-coverage mandate. Their employees and dependents do not have guaranteed contraceptive coverage.
Accommodation. Religiously affiliated nonprofit corporations may obtain an accommodation that relieves them from complying with the mandate. These employers must notify their insurance company, third-party administrator or the Department of Health and Human Services of their religious objections to providing insurance coverage for contraceptives.

Under the ACA, religious employers are exempt from the mandate, but religiously affiliated employers must take steps to obtain an accommodation. Nevertheless, these employers are not required to contract, arrange or pay for contraceptive coverage. According to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Burwell), the regulatory process to obtain an accommodation does not substantially burden religiously affiliated employers seeking to avoid the mandate.

Though some of the employers in Zubik are entitled to an accommodation, they argue that the process itself violates their sincerely held religious beliefs. According to these employers, complying with the regulatory mechanism to obtain an accommodation would make them “complicit in providing contraceptive coverage” in violation of their religion.

The passing of Justice Scalia leaves only eight justices to decide this case. Many believe they are evenly divided. In the event of a 4-4- tie, the lower court rulings would remain intact, which could lead to inconsistent application of the law nationally because the Zubik case is actually a consolidation of several different cases from across the country. Perhaps this explains why the Court issued an order directing the parties to discuss ways to reach an acceptable compromise.

We may never know for sure why the Court did this, but it will be interesting to see if this exercise produces any results. Fortunately, we shouldn’t have to wait long because the Court didn’t give the parties much time. All briefs must be filed by April 20, 2016.

Stay tuned…

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the constantly changing health care landscape. In addition to our other valuable risk management solutionse, Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk has an online tool to help clients complete their ACA information reports.

Please contact us if you have any questions or would like to discuss how we can help you comply with health care reform.

Are You Ready for the New Affordable Care Act Reporting Requirements?

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) with 50 or more full-time or full-time equivalent employees to file information returns with the Internal Revenue Service and provide statements to their full-time employees about employer-offered health insurance coverage. This information will be used to administer the ACA’s employer shared responsibility provisions (employer mandate) and to determine whether an employee is eligible for the premium tax credit.

Filing Forms (Drafts)

In 2014, the IRS released non-final draft versions of two forms that ALEs can use to satisfy these reporting requirements.

Form 1095-C (Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage)
Form 1094-C (Transmittal of Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage Information Returns)

Filing Deadlines

ALEs must file these forms with the IRS on or before February 28 (March 31 if filed electronically) of the year immediately following the calendar year for which the offer of coverage information is reported. For calendar year 2014, there is no filing requirement. For calendar year 2015, these forms must be filed by February 29, 2016 (or March 31, 2016 if filed electronically).

ALEs must also furnish a Form 1095-C to each full-time employee by January 31 of the following year. The first Forms 1095-C are due to these individuals by February 1, 2016.

Form 1095-C

ALEs must file a Form 1095-C (or a substitute form) for each employee who was a full-time employee for any month of the calendar year. This form is used to report specific health insurance coverage information for each full-time employee to the IRS, such as:

which months the employee was a full-time employee
any offers of health coverage that meet the minimum value standard made to the employee and family members each month
the employee’s share of the monthly premium for the lowest-cost insurance that offers minimum value health coverage
whether any safe harbors are applicable to the employee
whether the employee was enrolled in the plan

Form 1094-C

ALEs must use Form 1094-C to transmit its Forms 1095-C to the IRS. A Form 1094-C must be attached to any Forms 1095-C filed by an ALE. One transmittal form can be used to cover all Forms 1095-C filed by an ALE or multiple transmittal forms can be used. The information reported with this form includes:

the total number of Forms 1095-C submitted with this particular transmittal
the total number of Forms 1095-C that will be filed by the ALE
whether the ALE is a member of an aggregate group (multiple employers treated as a single employer)
whether special rules or transition relief apply to the ALE

Though these ACA reporting forms are not due until 2016, large employers cannot wait until the last minute. Given the technical nature and complexity of the new ACA reporting requirements, legal and tax professionals should be consulted when preparing any forms filed with the IRS.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the health care reform process. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

Counting Employees under the Affordable Care Act’s Pay-or-Play Provisions

Employers subject to the Affordable Care Act’s Employer Shared Responsibility provisions may be assessed a penalty if they do not offer affordable health coverage that provides a minimum level of coverage to their full-time employees and their dependents. Whether an employer is subject to these pay-or-play provisions depends on the number of people it employs. When counting employees, however, there are specific rules that must be followed.

An employer is generally considered an “Applicable Large Employer” subject to the pay-or-play provisions if it employed an average of at least 50 full-time employees, including full-time equivalent employees (FTEs), on business days during the preceding calendar year. To determine whether an employer is considered an Applicable Large Employer for a calendar year:

Add the total number of full-time employees for each calendar month in the preceding calendar year, and the total number of Full Time Equivalent employees for each calendar month in the preceding calendar year.
Divide the sum by 12.
If the result is not a whole number, round it down to the next lowest whole number

If the result of this calculation is less than 50, the employer is not considered an Applicable Large Employer for the current calendar year. If the result is 50 or more, the employer is an Applicable Large Employer for the current calendar year.

[Note that transition relief was provided to qualifying employers with an average of 50-99 full-time and full-time equivalent employees on business days during 2014, so that they will not be assessed a penalty in 2015.]

The first step to counting employees is identifying full-time and full-time equivalent employees. A full-time employee, with respect to a calendar month, is an employee who works an average of at least 30 hours per week, or 130 hours in a calendar month. A full-time equivalent employee isn’t an actual person. Rather, it’s a term used to describe the combination of all non-full-time employees who are counted as the equivalent of a full-time employee.

The number of FTEs for each calendar month in the preceding calendar year is determined by calculating the aggregate number of hours of service for that calendar month for non-full-time employees (but not more than 120 hours of service for any employee) and dividing that number by 120. Fractions may be rounded to the nearest one hundredth.

For example, assume that during each calendar month of 2015, Employer W has 25 employees averaging 35 hours of service per week and 40 employees each of whom averages 90 hours of service per calendar month. Each of the 25 employees averaging 35 hours of service per week count as one full-time employee, so Employer W has 25 full-time employees for each calendar month in 2015.

To determine the number of FTEs for each calendar month, combine the hours of service of the 40 non-full-time employees (40 employees x 90 hours) and divide that number by 120. This calculation (40 x 90 = 3,600, and 3,600 / 120 = 30) shows that Employer W has 30 FTEs for each calendar month in 2015. Since Employer W had 55 full-time and full-time equivalent employees during each calendar month in 2015, Employer W will be considered an Applicable Large Employer for 2016.

The regulations contain a number of specific rules, methods and exceptions that must be considered when counting employees. For example, in some cases an employer may not have to include seasonal workers when counting employees. Given the complexity of some of these rules, methods and exceptions, employers should consult with an attorney to make sure they’ve counted correctly.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the changes coming in 2014. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

Offering Health Insurance to Same-Sex Spouses

Under the Affordable Care Act, health insurance issuers in the individual and group markets are generally required to guarantee insurance coverage to every employer and individual that applies. Beginning in 2015, this guarantee will extend to same-sex spouses.

On March 14, 2014, the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) announced that insurance companies offering non-grandfathered health insurance plans can no longer refuse to offer health insurance coverage to same-sex spouses. In taking this position, the HHS relied on federal regulations prohibiting health insurance issuers from employing marketing practices or benefit designs that discriminate on the basis of, among other things, an individual’s sexual orientation.

According to HHS, an issuer is considered to employ discriminatory marketing practices or benefit designs if the issuer:

Offers health insurance coverage to a spouse in an opposite-sex marriage; and
Does not offer the same coverage to a spouse in a same-sex marriage that was validly consummated in a jurisdiction where the law authorizes same-sex marriages.

Importantly, the prohibition against discriminating against same-sex spouses applies regardless of the jurisdiction in which the insurance policy is offered, sold, issued, renewed, in effect, or operated, and regardless of where the policyholder resides. This means that insurance companies must offer coverage to legally married same-sex spouses even if they live in a state that does not allow same-sex marriages.

HHS noted that its position regarding coverage for same-sex spouses does not require a group health plan to provide coverage that is inconsistent with the terms of eligibility for coverage under the plan, or that otherwise interferes with the ability of a plan sponsor to define a dependent spouse for purposes of eligibility for coverage under the plan. It only prohibits an issuer from refusing to offer the option to cover same-sex spouses on the same terms and conditions as opposite sex-spouses.

According to HHS, it is only clarifying the current regulations’ prohibition against discrimination based on sexual orientation in a manner that is consistent with the policy of ensuring that all individuals have access to health coverage. However, since “some issuers may not have understood the prohibition,” HHS is not requiring immediate compliance. Rather, health insurance issuers must implement changes for plans or policies years beginning on or after January 1, 2015.

Though fewer than half the states allow same-sex marriages, employers in every state need to be aware of health insurance requirements for same-sex spouses. Beginning in 2015, the focus will need to be on the legality of the marriage rather than the gender of the spouses.

Recent developments with the Affordable Care Act suggest that change rather than stability should be expected. At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the changes coming in 2014 and beyond. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act.

If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you would like to subscribe to our newsletters please click here.

Affordable Care Act Implementation in 2014

As 2013 comes to an end, many are making plans and resolutions for the New Year. 2014 is also a big year for the Affordable Care Act, as many of the Act’s provisions go into effect, such as:

Individual Mandate. Under the Act, most individuals who can afford basic health coverage will be required to obtain such coverage or pay a penalty to help offset the costs of caring for uninsured Americans. Various exemptions to the individual mandate are available, including one if affordable coverage is not available.

Employer Mandate. Beginning in 2014, large employers who failed to offer qualifying health care coverage to their employees may have been required to pay a penalty (tax). However, enforcement of this provision has been postponed from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2015.

Health Insurance Marketplace (Exchanges). Starting in 2014, individuals and small businesses can shop for and buy qualified health benefit plans on the Health Insurance Exchanges. These new marketplaces are designed to offer consumers with various options for health plans that meet certain benefits and cost standards.

Essential Health Benefits. The Act creates essential health benefits packages that provide coverage for specific services. These packages are separated into four categories that vary based on the proportion of plan benefits they cover.

Elimination of Annual Coverage Limits. The Affordable Care Act prohibits new plans and existing group plans from imposing annual dollar limits on the amount of coverage an individual may receive.

Ban on Discrimination Due to Pre-Existing Conditions or Gender. In 2014, insurance companies cannot refuse to sell coverage or renew policies because of an individual’s pre-existing conditions. Also, in the individual and small group market, the law eliminates the ability of insurance companies to charge higher rates due to gender or health status.

Protection for Clinical Trials. Insurers will be prohibited from dropping or limiting coverage because an individual chooses to participate in a clinical trial. This protection applies to clinical trials that treat cancer or other life-threatening diseases.

Increasing Small Business Tax Credit. The Affordable Care Act’s second phase of the small business tax credit for qualified small businesses and small non-profit organizations starts in 2014. The credit is up to 50% of the employer’s contribution to provide health insurance for employees. There is also up to a 35% credit for small non-profit organizations.

Individual Tax Credits. Starting in 2014, tax credits will become available for people with income between 100% and 400% of the poverty line who are not eligible for other affordable coverage. The tax credit can be advanced, so it can lower premium payments each month. It’s also refundable, so moderate-income families can receive the full benefit of the credit. Individuals may also qualify for reduced cost-sharing (copayments, co-insurance, and deductibles).

Access to Medicaid. Americans who earn less than 133% of the poverty level (approximately $14,000 for an individual and $29,000 for a family of four) will be eligible to enroll in Medicaid. States may receive 100% federal funding for the first three years to support this expanded coverage, phasing to 90% federal funding in subsequent years.

If you would like to subscribe to our newsletters please click here.

Learn more about our Affordable Care Act Program.