Internal Revenue Service – Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk

Are You Ready for the New Affordable Care Act Reporting Requirements?

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) with 50 or more full-time or full-time equivalent employees to file information returns with the Internal Revenue Service and provide statements to their full-time employees about employer-offered health insurance coverage. This information will be used to administer the ACA’s employer shared responsibility provisions (employer mandate) and to determine whether an employee is eligible for the premium tax credit.

Filing Forms (Drafts)

In 2014, the IRS released non-final draft versions of two forms that ALEs can use to satisfy these reporting requirements.

Form 1095-C (Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage)
Form 1094-C (Transmittal of Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage Information Returns)

Filing Deadlines

ALEs must file these forms with the IRS on or before February 28 (March 31 if filed electronically) of the year immediately following the calendar year for which the offer of coverage information is reported. For calendar year 2014, there is no filing requirement. For calendar year 2015, these forms must be filed by February 29, 2016 (or March 31, 2016 if filed electronically).

ALEs must also furnish a Form 1095-C to each full-time employee by January 31 of the following year. The first Forms 1095-C are due to these individuals by February 1, 2016.

Form 1095-C

ALEs must file a Form 1095-C (or a substitute form) for each employee who was a full-time employee for any month of the calendar year. This form is used to report specific health insurance coverage information for each full-time employee to the IRS, such as:

which months the employee was a full-time employee
any offers of health coverage that meet the minimum value standard made to the employee and family members each month
the employee’s share of the monthly premium for the lowest-cost insurance that offers minimum value health coverage
whether any safe harbors are applicable to the employee
whether the employee was enrolled in the plan

Form 1094-C

ALEs must use Form 1094-C to transmit its Forms 1095-C to the IRS. A Form 1094-C must be attached to any Forms 1095-C filed by an ALE. One transmittal form can be used to cover all Forms 1095-C filed by an ALE or multiple transmittal forms can be used. The information reported with this form includes:

the total number of Forms 1095-C submitted with this particular transmittal
the total number of Forms 1095-C that will be filed by the ALE
whether the ALE is a member of an aggregate group (multiple employers treated as a single employer)
whether special rules or transition relief apply to the ALE

Though these ACA reporting forms are not due until 2016, large employers cannot wait until the last minute. Given the technical nature and complexity of the new ACA reporting requirements, legal and tax professionals should be consulted when preparing any forms filed with the IRS.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the health care reform process. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

IRS Modifies “Use-or-Lose” Rule for Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs)

On October 31, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) modified the longstanding cafeteria plan “use-or-lose” rule for health Flexible Spending Accounts/Arrangements (FSAs). Under this rule, unused FSA account balances are forfeited at the end of the plan year. Now, up to $500 of unused money may be carried over to the next plan year.

A cafeteria plan FSA, which is offered with other employer-established benefits, reimburses employees for qualified medical expenses. FSAs are usually funded by employees through voluntary salary reductions of up to $2,500 per year, though employers may also contribute. FSA contributions are not included in an employee’s income and reimbursements for qualified medical expenses are not taxed.

For nearly 30 years, FSAs have been subject to the “use-or-lose” rule. However, last year the IRS asked whether the rule should be modified to provide greater flexibility. The overwhelming response was yes. The reasons for increased flexibility include:

Difficulties in predicting future medical expenditures
Minimizing incentives for unnecessary spending to avoid forfeiture
The possibility that lower paid employees are reluctant to participate in FSAs because even modest forfeitures can be significant
Easing and simplifying the administration of FSAs

Under the new rule for cafeteria plan FSAs, employers may allow employees to carryover up to $500 of unused FSA money to the next plan year. Any amounts carried over may be used to pay or reimburse medical expenses incurred during that entire plan year. Employers have the option, not the obligation, to let employees carryover unused FSA money. And, since $500 is the maximum amount that can be carried over, employers may choose a lower amount.

Currently, cafeteria plans are allowed to have a “grace period” of up to two months and 15 days after the plan year during which participants may use remaining FSA money from the previous plan year to pay expenses incurred during the grace period. Since this is a popular feature among many plans, it is important to note that plans may provide employees with a carryover option OR a grace period. A health FSA cannot have both.

Employers wishing to utilize the new carryover option must amend their cafeteria plan. The amendment must be adopted on or before the last day of the plan year and may, in some cases, be effective retroactively to the first day of that plan year. Plans must also be amended to eliminate any grace period by no later than the end of that plan year, though the IRS notes that this may be subject to “non-code legal constraints.”

Given the complexity of providing and managing cafeteria plans, as well as the liability for getting it wrong, employers should consult with appropriate professionals to make sure their plans meet their minimum needs and provide maximum benefits.

If you have any questions or would like to speak with one of our Risk Management Professionals, please contact us.

If you would like to subscribe to our newsletters please click here.

No Penalty for Noncompliance with ACA’s Notice of Coverage Options

On September 11, 2013, the United States Department of Labor announced that employers will not be fined or penalized under the Affordable Care Act for failing to provide employees with notice about coverage options available through the ACA’s Health Insurance Marketplace (Exchanges). This comes just weeks before the October 1, 2013 deadline for employers to begin providing the notice to their employees.

The announcement, which was posted on the DOL’s website as a “FAQ on Notice of Coverage Options,” states:

Q: Can an employer be fined for failing to provide employees with notice about the Affordable Care Act’s new Health Insurance Marketplace?

No. If your company is covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act, it should provide a written notice to its employees about the Health Insurance Marketplace by October 1, 2013, but there is no fine or penalty under the law for failing to provide the notice.

A day later, the U.S. Small Business Administration posted similar information on its website.

This announcement comes as a surprise to those who assumed that noncompliance would be met with a fine or penalty. Though the ACA’s employer notice requirement does not contain a specific penalty provision, many assumed that the ACA’s general penalty of $100 per day would apply. And, since news of the DOL’s position came informally through its website rather than the formal regulatory process, some believe that fines or penalties for noncompliance remain a possibility in the future.

This new development has understandably left many employers unsure about how to deal with the ACA’s employer notice requirement. Though it is still the law, the DOL’s announcement has undoubtedly left many wondering whether a requirement can really exist without consequences.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the constantly changing health care reform landscape. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act.

If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, view our health product page.

If you would like to subscribe to our newsletters please click here.

Affordable Care Act’s Employer Mandate Delayed Until 2015

Shortly before the July 4th holiday, the U.S. Department of the Treasury announced that enforcement of the Employer Shared Responsibility requirement under the Affordable Care Act (Act) will be delayed until 2015. The employer mandate, which generally requires employers with at least 50 full-time or full-time equivalent employees to offer health care benefits or pay a penalty, was scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2014.

Through a dialogue with businesses about the Act’s employer and insurer reporting requirements, the administration learned of concerns about the complexity of the requirements and the need for more time to implement them effectively. As a result, the administration decided to delay the Act’s mandatory employer and insurer reporting requirements.

According to the announcement, this delay is designed to:

Provide the administration more time to consider ways to simplify the new reporting requirements consistent with the law.
Provide more time to adapt health coverage and reporting systems while employers are moving toward making health coverage affordable and accessible for their employees.

The administration recognized that delaying the Act’s mandatory employer and insurer reporting requirements will make it impractical to determine which employers owe shared responsibility payments for 2014. As a result, the administration decided to also delay enforcement of the employer mandate, stating that “these payments will not apply for 2014. Any employer shared responsibility payments will not apply until 2015.”

The Treasury says it will be publishing formal guidance regarding the delayed enforcement soon and that proposed rules will be published this summer. Once these rules have been issued, the administration says it will work with employers, insurers and other reporting entities to strongly encourage them to voluntarily implement this information reporting in 2014, in preparation for the full application of the provisions in 2015.

So what should employers be doing now? The Employer Shared Responsibility provision is still the law, it just isn’t being enforced. Not surprisingly, talking heads are making predictions and debating whether it’s really speeding if nobody can pull you over. Unfortunately, the manner in which employer’s will be affected by the delay will not be known until additional guidance is issued.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the changing health care reform landscape. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

The Affordable Care Act’s Individual Mandate

The Affordable Care Act’s Individual Shared Responsibility provision requires nonexempt individuals to obtain minimum essential coverage for themselves and any nonexempt dependents. Starting January 1, 2014, those failing to get the required health insurance will have to pay a monthly penalty.

Who is subject to the penalty?

The penalty, which is calculated monthly, applies to individuals of all ages, including senior citizens and children. An individual is liable for the penalty assessed against any other individual who can be claimed as a dependent for federal income tax purposes. If an individual files a joint return, that individual and their spouse are jointly liable for the penalty. Penalties will be paid by including them with an individual’s tax return.

What is Minimum Essential Coverage?

Minimum essential coverage generally includes:

Employer-sponsored coverage (including COBRA coverage and retiree coverage)
Coverage purchased in the individual market
Grandfathered health plans
Medicare and Medicaid coverage
Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage
Certain types of Veterans’ health coverage
TRICARE (Department of Defense health care program)

How much is the penalty?

The Individual Shared Responsibility penalty is calculated monthly by using a flat dollar amount or a percentage of household income, whichever is greater. Under the flat dollar amount method, each nonexempt individual is penalized a fixed amount. For individuals under the age of 18, the penalty is one-half the fixed amount. If an individual is responsible for multiple dependents, the total penalty cannot be more than 300% of the applicable fixed amount.

The fixed amounts used to calculate the penalty are:

$95 in 2014 ($7.92 per month)
$325 in 2015 ($27.08 per month)
$695 in 2016 ($57.92 per month)
$695 + cost-of-living increase in 2017 and beyond.

Under the percentage of income method, the penalty is a percentage of an individual’s household income, less specific deductions. To calculate household income, add the individual’s modified adjusted gross income to the modified adjusted gross incomes of the individual’s family members.

The percentages used to calculate the penalty are:

1% in 2014
2% in 2015
2.5% in 2016 and beyond.

For example, in 2014, the annual penalty will be $95 per adult and $47.50 per child, but no more than $285 (300% of $95) or 1% of the household income, whichever is greater.

Is there a maximum limit for the penalty?

Yes. The Individual Shared Responsibility penalty cannot be more than the national average premium for bronze-level (covering 60% of costs) qualified health plans offered through Affordable Insurance Exchanges. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that in 2016, the national average will be approximately $5,000 for individuals and $12,500 for families of four.

Are there any exemptions from the Minimum Essential Coverage requirement?

Yes. The following individuals are not required to obtain Minimum Essential Coverage:

Members of a religious sect that is legally recognized as being conscientiously opposed to accepting any insurance benefits.
Members of a recognized health care sharing ministry.
Individuals who are not U.S. Citizens, U.S. Nationals or lawfully present aliens.
Individuals incarcerated following disposition of criminal charges.
Members of a recognized Indian tribe.
Individuals with income below the threshold for filing a tax return.
Individuals whose required contribution for coverage exceeds 8% of their household income.
Individuals who have been certified as suffering a hardship.
Individuals with a gap in health insurance coverage of less than three consecutive months during the year.

Though proposed regulations explaining the Individual Shared Responsibility penalty have been published by the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Health and Human Services, they are not final and may change.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through Health Care Reform. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

Affordable Care Act Notice Requirement Delayed

To help individuals understand their health insurance options under the Affordable Care Act (Act), employers are required to give employees written notice about Affordable Insurance Exchanges. The Act’s March 1, 2013 deadline for employers to start giving this notice to all employees was recently pushed back by the Department of Labor (DOL).

Under the Act, the DOL is required to define the scope of the notice requirement and provide guidance on how the requirement can be satisfied by issuing regulations. Unfortunately, these regulations aren’t finished yet, and the DOL has taken the position that employers should not be required to comply with the Act’ notice requirement until the regulations are done.

According to the DOL, “the timing for distribution of notices will be the late summer or fall of 2013, which will coordinate with the open enrollment period for Exchanges.”

So what is the reason for the delay? According to the DOL, efforts need to be coordinated with the Department of Health and Human Services and the Internal Revenue Service. The DOL is considering the possibility of including model, generic language in the regulations that could be used to satisfy the notice requirement and also allowing employers to satisfy the notice requirement by providing employees with an employer coverage template. Regardless of their final form, the DOL expects the regulations to provide employers with flexibility and adequate time to comply.

Until the Act’s notice requirement becomes effective, Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can be your source of information about health insurance. Be sure to check back with us periodically for future updates. In the meantime, if you have specific questions about your health insurance or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, please contact us.

Finding Safe Harbor from the Employer Mandate

Under the Affordable Care Act’s Employer Shared Responsibility provisions, “large” employers with at least 50 full-time equivalent employees may be subject to an annual $2,000 or $3,000 penalty (tax) per qualifying employee. An employer may avoid the penalty by offering health coverage to at least 95% of its full-time employees (and dependents) under an “affordable” plan that provides “minimum value.”

A plan will generally satisfy the “minimum value” requirement if it covers at least 60% of health care costs. To be considered “affordable,” the employee’s required contribution for employee-only coverage cannot be more than 9.5% of the employee’s household income for the taxable year.

In the context of determining whether a plan satisfies the affordability requirement, the Internal Revenue Service recognized the likely inability of employers to ascertain the household income for each of its employees. As a result, the proposed regulations recently published by the IRS allow employers to take advantage of three safe harbor provisions.

Form W-2 Safe Harbor

Application of the Form W-2 Safe Harbor, which is determined after the calendar year on an employee-by-employee basis, takes into account the employee’s Form W-2 wages and the employee contribution.

An employer will not be assessed a penalty for an employee if the required annual contribution for the employer’s cheapest employee-only coverage plan is not more than 9.5% of that employee’s Form W-2 wages from the employer. If an employee is not offered coverage for an entire calendar year, the Form W-2 wages can be adjusted to reflect the period for which coverage was offered.

To avoid manipulation, the proposed regulations provide that the employee’s required contribution must remain consistent during the calendar year and that an employer cannot make discretionary adjustments to the required employee contribution for a pay period.

Rate of Pay Safe Harbor

Under the Rate of Pay Safe Harbor, an employer:

takes the rate of pay for each hourly employee who is eligible for coverage under the plan as of the beginning of the plan year; and
multiplies that rate by 130 hours (the benchmark for monthly full-time status) to compute the employee’s monthly wages.

If the employee’s monthly contribution amount for the cheapest employee-only coverage plan is not more than 9.5 percent of the computed monthly wages, then the coverage is considered affordable. For salaried employees, the monthly salary would be used to determine affordability.

The Rate of Pay Safe Harbor allows employers to prospectively determine affordability without having to analyze every employee’s wages and hours. However, it may only be used for those employees who did not have their hourly wages or monthly salaries reduced by the employer during the year.

Federal Poverty Line Safe Harbor

Under the Federal Poverty Line (FPL) Safe Harbor, coverage is considered affordable if the employee’s cost for the cheapest employee-only coverage plan is not more than 9.5% of the FPL for a single individual. Under the regulations, employers may use the most recently published poverty guidelines for the first day of the plan year.

These safe harbors are optional. Large employers may use one or more of these for all employees or for any reasonable category of employees, provided they are used uniformly and consistently for all employees in a category.

The IRS will be accepting comments on these proposed regulations until March 18, 2013.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through what is sure to be a bumpy ride. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

IRS Softens Affordable Care Act’s Penalty Provision

On January 2, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service published proposed regulations regarding one of the Affordable Care Act’s more controversial provisions–the Employer Shared Responsibility (penalty) provision. Under this provision, an employer may face an annual $2,000 or $3,000 penalty (tax) per qualifying employee depending on whether health coverage is offered to full-time employees.

Starting in 2014, a “large employer” may be subject to the Employer Shared Responsibility provision if:

the employer does not offer health coverage to at least 95% of its full-time employees, and at least one of the full-time employees receives a premium tax credit for purchasing individual coverage on an Affordable Insurance Exchange, or
the employer offers health coverage to at least 95% of its full-time employees, but at least one full-time employee receives a premium tax credit to help pay for coverage on an Exchange.

A full-time employ will typically be entitled to a premium tax credit if the employer did not offer coverage to that employee or if the employer’s coverage was either unaffordable to the employee or did not provide minimum value.

A “large employer” under the Employer Shared Responsibility provision employs:

at least 50 full-time (30 hours per week) employees, or
a combination of full-time and part-time employees that equals at least 50 full-time employees. For example, 40 full-time employees plus 20 part-time employees working15 hours per week are equivalent to 50 full-time employees.

The number of employees in a given year will be used to determine whether an employer will be considered a large employer for the next year. In other words, if an employer has 50 full-time employees in 2013, it will be considered a large employer for 2014.

Significantly, the proposed regulations give large employers a welcome margin of error. Citing the lack of flexibility or margin for error, the proposed IRS regulations provide that the penalty will not apply if large employers offer coverage to at least 95% of their full-time employees. Note that after 2014, the 95% requirement will apply to full-time employees and their dependents.

The IRS will be accepting comments on these proposed regulations until March 18, 2013.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.