Employer Shared Responsibility – Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk

Is Your Self Storage Facility a Hazardous Workplace?

The fact that self storage facilities aren’t typically considered dangerous workplaces doesn’t mean operators can be casual about workplace safety. According to the most recent statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, of over 3 million private industry nonfatal reportable injuries and illnesses in 2013:

917,100 involved days away from work
327,060 involved sprains, strains and tears
170,450 involved injuries to the back
229,190 involved falls, slips and trips.

Though employees are the primary victims of poor workplace safety standards, self storage facilities also pay the price. In addition to direct costs associated with workplace injuries, self storage facilities may also incur a variety of indirect costs, such as:

Wages paid to absent injured workers;
Wages lost during work stoppages;
Administrative time spent by supervisors following injuries;
Costs to train replacement employees;
Lost productivity and opportunity costs;
Replacement costs of damaged material, machinery and property; and
Higher workers’ compensation insurance premiums.

Self storage facilities can avoid or at least limit these costs by making workplace safety a priority. The Insurance Information Institute suggests taking the following steps:

Engage Management and Employees. Workplaces are safer when management and employees collaborate. Though specific employees should be in charge of safety programs, everyone should be responsible for workplace safety.

Evaluate Workplace and Operations. Perform a comprehensive evaluation of the entire operation, including equipment and all workplace activities, to identify all hazards. Talk to employees about their safety concerns.

Mitigate Hazards. Identified hazards must be eliminated or controlled. This may require implementing new safety measures, changing workplace operations or repairing/replacing equipment.

Training. Employees should receive training about workplace hazards and safety. Training should be part of the onboarding process. Refresher training should be provided on a regular basis and as needed.

Review, Respond and Improve. Maintaining a safe workplace is an ongoing process. Safety programs must be reviewed regularly. Safety incidents should be used as an opportunity for improvement. Employees should be reminded of their obligation to report hazards and incidents so they can be addressed.

Creating and maintaining a safe workplace requires commitment and vigilance. Despite the extra effort and expense, self storage facilities are sure to benefit from an effective workplace safety program. For example, maintaining a safe workplace is the best way to control workers’ compensation insurance premiums.

Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk’s Self-Storage Insurance Program and Risk Management Group work closely with self-storage facilities throughout Florida and nationwide to profile risks, compare coverage options, and match our clients with an insurance program that meets their needs.

If you have any questions or would like discuss how our programs can help your organization, please contact us

Summary Plan Descriptions under ERISA

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) is a federal law that sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established employee pension and welfare plans in the private sector. To protect individuals in these plans, ERISA requires plan administrators, which are oftentimes the employers, to provide plan participants and their beneficiaries with a Summary Plan Description (SPD).

SPDs are used to give plan participants and beneficiaries important information about pension plans, like 401(k) and profit sharing plans, and welfare plans, like group health, disability and pre-paid legal plans. SPDs provide information about the plan, what benefits are available under the plan, the rights of participants and beneficiaries under the plan, and how the plan works.

SPDs must generally be given to each plan participant and each beneficiary receiving benefits under the plan within 90 days after first becoming covered by the plan. Under ERISA, SPDs must generally:

Identify the plan name, plan number and employer identification number (EIN)
Describe the type of plan (ex. 401(k), profit sharing, group health, disability)
Describe the type of plan administration
Provide contact information for the plan administrator and service of process
Describe the plan’s eligibility requirements
Describe circumstances which may result in disqualification, ineligibility, denial, loss, forfeiture, suspension or reduction of benefits
State the date of the plan’s fiscal year
Describe the procedures governing claims for benefits, applicable time limits and remedies if claims are denied
Describe provisions governing termination of the plan
A statement of rights available to plan participants under ERISA

SPDs for employee pension plans must include additional information, such as:

The plan’s normal retirement age
A description of benefits, eligibility, vesting and accrual
A statement about whether the plan is covered by termination insurance from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Source of contributions to the plan and the methods used to calculate contributions amounts

Similarly, SPDs for employee welfare plans must also include additional information, such as information about:

Cost-sharing provisions, including costs of premiums, deductibles, coinsurance and copayment requirements
Annual or lifetime caps or limits on benefits
Coverage for preventive services
Coverage for drugs, medical tests, devices and procedures
The use of network providers, the composition of provider networks and whether, and under what circumstances, coverage is provided for out-of-network services
Conditions or limits on the selection of primary care providers or providers of specialty medical care
Conditions or limits applicable to obtaining emergency medical care
Preauthorization requirements or utilization review as a condition to obtaining a benefit or service

Since comprehension is the key, SPDs must follow strict style and formatting requirements. For example:

SPDs must be written in a manner calculated to be understood by the average plan participant
SPDs must be sufficiently comprehensive to apprise the plan’s participants and beneficiaries of their rights and obligations under the plan
SPDs must not be formatted in a way that misleads, misinforms or fails to inform participants and beneficiaries
Advantages and disadvantages of the plan must be presented without either exaggerating the benefits or minimizing the limitations
Exceptions, limitations, reductions, and restrictions of plan benefits cannot be minimized, rendered obscure or otherwise made to appear unimportant (style, caption, printing type and prominence must be the same as that used to describe plan benefits)

In fulfilling these requirements, plan administrators must consider the level of comprehension and education of typical participants in the plan and the complexity of the terms of the plan. In most cases, this will usually require limiting or eliminating technical jargon and long, complex sentences, and using clarifying examples, illustrations, clear cross references and a table of contents.

Unlike the general descriptions provided in this article, the SPD requirements are highly technical and very specific. To avoid violations, employers must confirm strict compliance with ERISA’s SPD requirement. If you have questions about your employee welfare plans, or if you would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

The Affordable Care Act’s Summary of Benefits and Coverage

The complexity of group health insurance makes it difficult for employers to shop for health plans and for employees to choose among several employer-provided options. Unfortunately, helpful consumer information is not typically found in the patchwork of various non-uniform and intricate consumer disclosures, such as the Summary Plan Description required by ERISA. To help consumers make informed decisions about health care coverage, the Affordable Care Act created the Summary of Benefits and Coverage and Uniform Glossary requirement.

Under this requirement, insurers and employers are required to give group health plan participants and beneficiaries, which are generally employees and their dependents, a short, plain-language Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC). A Uniform Glossary of terms used in health coverage and medical care must also be made available to plan participants and beneficiaries.

Insurers must provide the SBC to employers:

Upon Application (no later than 7 business days following receipt of the application)
By 1st Day of Coverage (if any changes to the initial SBC were made)
Upon Renewal (if renewal is automatic, no later than 30 days before the new plan year; if renewal applications are required, no later than the date application materials are distributed)
Upon Request (no later than 7 business days following receipt the request)

Plan participants and beneficiaries must also receive the SBC:

Upon Application (at the same time written application materials are distributed)
By 1st Day of Coverage (if any changes to the initial SBC were made)
Upon Renewal (if renewal is automatic, no later than 30 days before the new plan year, or within 7 business days after the new policy is issued; if renewal applications are required, no later than the date applications are distributed to participants)
Upon Request (no later than 7 business days following receipt the request)

Though insurers and employers are both responsible for providing the SBC to plan participants and beneficiaries, only one SBC is required. Under the regulations, the obligation of one is satisfied if the other provides the required SBC in a timely manner. To avoid violations, employers must confirm, not assume, that the insurer is providing the required SBCs to plan participants and beneficiaries.

The SBC must include the following:

Uniform definitions of standard insurance and medical terms
Descriptions of coverage, including cost sharing, for each category of benefits
Exceptions, reductions and limitations of coverages
Cost-sharing provisions, including deductible, coinsurance and copayment obligations
Renewability and continuation of coverage
Coverage examples
A statement about whether the plan or coverage provides minimum essential coverage and whether the share of the total allowed costs meets applicable requirements
A statement that the SBC is only a summary of coverage
contact information (telephone number, Internet address) for asking questions or requesting copies of plan or policy documents
An Internet address (or similar contact information) for obtaining a list of network providers (for plans with one or more networks of providers)
An Internet address (or similar contact information) for obtaining coverage information (for plans that use a formulary for prescription drug coverage)

The SBC must also provide an Internet address and phone number that plan participants and beneficiaries can use to obtain the Uniform Glossary, which provides definitions for a number of health-coverage-related and medical terms. Insurers and employers must provide the Uniform Glossary, in either paper or electronic form, no later than 7 business days after receiving a request from a plan participant or beneficiary.

The SBC and Uniform Glossary requirements, which also apply to grandfathered plans, became effective on September 23, 2012. However, the administration extended various safe harbors and enforcement relief through the end of the second year of applicability, so penalties will not be imposed on those working diligently and in good faith to meet the requirements.

Unlike the general descriptions provided in this article, the regulations are highly technical and very specific. For example, the SBC cannot be more than 4 double-sided pages in length and cannot use print smaller than 12-point font. Paying attention to the details is critical. Since a willful failure to provide the required information can result in a $1,000 fine for each plan participant or beneficiary, employers cannot afford a casual approach to SBCs.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to serving as a resource for Affordable Care Act compliance. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

Affordable Care Act Update

Despite becoming law over four years ago, the Affordable Care Act continues to make headlines. Since it’s not easy to keep track of all the changes, let’s take a look at some of the more significant recent developments.

Elimination of Small Group Deductible Limits

A significant ACA change scheduled to take effect in 2014 involves annual deductible limits for small groups. Under this provision, small group health plan deductibles could not be more than $2,000 for individuals or $4,000 for families. Those who were concerned about the lack of flexibility caused by these deductible limits no longer have to worry.

The small group deductible limits were rather unceremoniously eliminated by the Protecting Access to Medicare Act, which was signed into law on April 1, 2014. Since these limits were retroactively eliminated back to the day the ACA was originally enacted, it’s almost like they never existed. This is welcome news for many small groups, which are typically those employers with up to 50 employees, but which may be employers with up to 100 employees.

However, it is important to note that the ACA’s annual out-of-pocket cost-sharing limits have not changed. Since these cost-sharing limits specifically apply to deductibles, among other things, employers must still be aware of indirect deductible limitations. The 2014 annual out-of-pocket limit is $6,350 for individuals and $12,700 for families.

Updated Model COBRA Notices

Under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA), employees and their families may have the option of staying on their former employer’s health insurance plan for a limited period of time after their employment ends. Despite having to pay the entire premium, including any portion previously paid by their employer, COBRA coverage has typically been cheaper than individual or family coverage because the premiums are based on the employer’s group rates. However, with the new Health Insurance Marketplace created by the ACA, this may no longer be the case.

Phyllis C. Borzi, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employee Benefits Security, said that, “in many cases, workers eligible for COBRA continuation coverage can save significant sums of money by instead purchasing health insurance through the Marketplace…It is important that workers know that in some cases there is a Marketplace option as well.”

To let employees know they may have an alternative to continuing their health care coverage under COBRA, the Department of Labor updated its Model COBRA General Notice and Model COBRA Election Notice. According to the Department of Labor, these updated notices make it clear to workers that if they are eligible for COBRA continuation coverage when leaving a job, they may choose to instead purchase coverage through the Health Insurance Marketplace.

Employer Mandate

In February 2014, the Internal Revenue Service provided transition relief from the ACA’s employer responsibility provisions. Employers with 100 or more employees wanting to avoid the penalty must offer coverage to 70% of their full-time employees in 2015, and 95% in 2016 and beyond. Large employers that do not meet these standards will have to make employer responsibility payments beginning in 2015. Employers with 50 to 99 full time employees will not be subject to a penalty until 2016, provided they meet certain conditions.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the changes coming in 2014. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

Offering Health Insurance to Same-Sex Spouses

Under the Affordable Care Act, health insurance issuers in the individual and group markets are generally required to guarantee insurance coverage to every employer and individual that applies. Beginning in 2015, this guarantee will extend to same-sex spouses.

On March 14, 2014, the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) announced that insurance companies offering non-grandfathered health insurance plans can no longer refuse to offer health insurance coverage to same-sex spouses. In taking this position, the HHS relied on federal regulations prohibiting health insurance issuers from employing marketing practices or benefit designs that discriminate on the basis of, among other things, an individual’s sexual orientation.

According to HHS, an issuer is considered to employ discriminatory marketing practices or benefit designs if the issuer:

Offers health insurance coverage to a spouse in an opposite-sex marriage; and
Does not offer the same coverage to a spouse in a same-sex marriage that was validly consummated in a jurisdiction where the law authorizes same-sex marriages.

Importantly, the prohibition against discriminating against same-sex spouses applies regardless of the jurisdiction in which the insurance policy is offered, sold, issued, renewed, in effect, or operated, and regardless of where the policyholder resides. This means that insurance companies must offer coverage to legally married same-sex spouses even if they live in a state that does not allow same-sex marriages.

HHS noted that its position regarding coverage for same-sex spouses does not require a group health plan to provide coverage that is inconsistent with the terms of eligibility for coverage under the plan, or that otherwise interferes with the ability of a plan sponsor to define a dependent spouse for purposes of eligibility for coverage under the plan. It only prohibits an issuer from refusing to offer the option to cover same-sex spouses on the same terms and conditions as opposite sex-spouses.

According to HHS, it is only clarifying the current regulations’ prohibition against discrimination based on sexual orientation in a manner that is consistent with the policy of ensuring that all individuals have access to health coverage. However, since “some issuers may not have understood the prohibition,” HHS is not requiring immediate compliance. Rather, health insurance issuers must implement changes for plans or policies years beginning on or after January 1, 2015.

Though fewer than half the states allow same-sex marriages, employers in every state need to be aware of health insurance requirements for same-sex spouses. Beginning in 2015, the focus will need to be on the legality of the marriage rather than the gender of the spouses.

Recent developments with the Affordable Care Act suggest that change rather than stability should be expected. At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the changes coming in 2014 and beyond. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act.

If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you would like to subscribe to our newsletters please click here.

Affordable Care Act’s Employer Mandate Delayed…Again

On February 10, 2014, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued final regulations implementing the employer responsibility provisions under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Despite being previously delayed, the final regulations provide transition relief to employers with 50 or more employees, which, according to the administration, should ensure a gradual phase-in of the employer mandate.

Since the employer mandate does not apply to employers with fewer than 50 employees, small employers are not required to provide coverage or fill out any forms in 2015, or in any year, under the ACA. For employers with 50 or more full-time employees, the final regulations provide the following transition relief.

Large Employers (100 or more employees): The final regulations reduce the percentage of full-time employees that must be offered health coverage. To avoid paying a penalty, large employers must offer coverage to 70% of their full-time employees in 2015, and 95% in 2016 and beyond. Large employers that do not meet these standards will have to make employer responsibility payments beginning in 2015.

Medium Employers (50 to 99 employees): The employer responsibility provisions will not apply to employers with 50 to 99 full-time employees until 2016. However, to be eligible for this transition relief, employers must certify that they meet the following conditions:

Limited Workforce Size. The employer must employ an average of at least 50 but fewer than 100 full-time employees (including full-time equivalents) on business days during 2014. The number of full-time employees (including full-time equivalents) is determined in accordance with the otherwise applicable rules in the final regulations for determining status as an applicable large employer.
Maintenance of Workforce and Aggregate Hours of Service. From February 9, 2014 to December 31, 2014, the employer may not reduce the size of its workforce or the overall hours of service of its employees in order to qualify for the transition relief. However, an employer that reduces workforce size or overall hours of service for bona fide business reasons is still eligible for the relief.
Maintenance of Previously Offered Health Coverage. From February 9, 2014 to December 31, 2015 (or, for employers with non-calendar-year plans, the last day of the 2015 plan year), the employer does not eliminate or materially reduce the health coverage, if any, it offered as of February 9, 2014. An employer will generally not be treated as eliminating or materially reducing health coverage if: (i) the employer contributes at least 95 percent of the dollar amount or at least the same percentage of the cost of coverage that was offered on February 9, 2014; (ii) any changes in benefits to employee-only coverage continue to provide minimum value; and (iii) the employer does not narrow or reduce the classes of employees (or the employees’ dependents) to whom coverage under was offered on February 9, 2014.

Since the final regulations cover a number of different topics and are highly technical, employers looking to take advantage of the transition relief should consult with a licensed professional.

Though many welcome the transition relief provided in the final regulations, it doesn’t look like 2014 will bring stability and predictability to health care under the Affordable Care Act. At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the changes coming in 2014. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

Affordable Care Act’s Employer Mandate Delayed Until 2015

Shortly before the July 4th holiday, the U.S. Department of the Treasury announced that enforcement of the Employer Shared Responsibility requirement under the Affordable Care Act (Act) will be delayed until 2015. The employer mandate, which generally requires employers with at least 50 full-time or full-time equivalent employees to offer health care benefits or pay a penalty, was scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2014.

Through a dialogue with businesses about the Act’s employer and insurer reporting requirements, the administration learned of concerns about the complexity of the requirements and the need for more time to implement them effectively. As a result, the administration decided to delay the Act’s mandatory employer and insurer reporting requirements.

According to the announcement, this delay is designed to:

Provide the administration more time to consider ways to simplify the new reporting requirements consistent with the law.
Provide more time to adapt health coverage and reporting systems while employers are moving toward making health coverage affordable and accessible for their employees.

The administration recognized that delaying the Act’s mandatory employer and insurer reporting requirements will make it impractical to determine which employers owe shared responsibility payments for 2014. As a result, the administration decided to also delay enforcement of the employer mandate, stating that “these payments will not apply for 2014. Any employer shared responsibility payments will not apply until 2015.”

The Treasury says it will be publishing formal guidance regarding the delayed enforcement soon and that proposed rules will be published this summer. Once these rules have been issued, the administration says it will work with employers, insurers and other reporting entities to strongly encourage them to voluntarily implement this information reporting in 2014, in preparation for the full application of the provisions in 2015.

So what should employers be doing now? The Employer Shared Responsibility provision is still the law, it just isn’t being enforced. Not surprisingly, talking heads are making predictions and debating whether it’s really speeding if nobody can pull you over. Unfortunately, the manner in which employer’s will be affected by the delay will not be known until additional guidance is issued.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through the changing health care reform landscape. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

Health Benefits and Value under the Affordable Care Act

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released final rules pursuant to the Affordable Care Act (Act) that are designed to help consumers shop for and compare health insurance options in the individual and small group markets. According to the HHS, these final rules will promote consistency among health plans, protect consumers by ensuring that plans cover a core package of health benefits and limit out of pocket expenses.

To make it easier for consumers to make apples-to-apples comparisons among health insurance plans, the final rules create uniform standards of coverage and value.

Essential Health Benefits

The Act provides that health plans offered in the individual and small group markets, including those available through Health Insurance Marketplaces (Exchange), must offer a core package of items and services known as Essential Health Benefits or EHBs, which must be equal in scope to those benefits offered by a typical employer plan. Under the Act, EHBs must provide:

Ambulatory patient services
Emergency services
Hospitalization
Maternity and newborn care
Mental health and substance use services, including behavioral health treatment
Prescription drugs
Rehabilitative services and devices
Laboratory services
Preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management
Pediatric services, including oral and vision care

To protect consumers against discrimination the final rules also:

Prohibit discriminatory benefit designs
Include special standards and options for coverage not typically covered by individual and small group policies
Include standards for prescription drug coverage

Actuarial Value

The final rules outline actuarial values of individual and small group plans to help consumers distinguish and compare plans offering different levels of coverage. Actuarial Value, or AV, is calculated as the percentage of total average costs covered by a plan. For example, if a plan has an AV of 70%, a consumer could expect to pay an average of 30% of the costs.

Beginning in 2014, non-grandfathered health plans in the individual and small group markets must meet certain AVs, which have been assigned the following “metal levels”:

A platinum health plan has an AV of 90%.
A gold health plan has an AV of 8%.
A silver health plan has an AV of 70%.
A bronze health plan has an AV of 60%.

To give health plans some flexibility, a plan can meet a particular metal level if its AV is within 2% of the standard. For example, a silver plan may have an AV between 68% and 72%. The final rules also provide flexibility, if necessary, for issuers in the small group market regarding annual deductible limits to achieve a particular metal level.

To streamline and standardize the calculation of AV for health insurance issuers, HHS is providing a publicly available AV Calculator. In 2014, this calculator will use a national standard population, but in 2015, HHS will accept state-specific data sets for the standard population if states choose to submit alternate data for the calculator.

According to HHS, these final rules will give consumers a consistent way to compare and enroll in health coverage in the individual and small group markets, while giving states and insurers more flexibility and freedom to implement the Act. Time will tell if these final rules will achieve their desired purpose.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through Health Care Reform. Check back with us periodically for informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

Finding Safe Harbor from the Employer Mandate

Under the Affordable Care Act’s Employer Shared Responsibility provisions, “large” employers with at least 50 full-time equivalent employees may be subject to an annual $2,000 or $3,000 penalty (tax) per qualifying employee. An employer may avoid the penalty by offering health coverage to at least 95% of its full-time employees (and dependents) under an “affordable” plan that provides “minimum value.”

A plan will generally satisfy the “minimum value” requirement if it covers at least 60% of health care costs. To be considered “affordable,” the employee’s required contribution for employee-only coverage cannot be more than 9.5% of the employee’s household income for the taxable year.

In the context of determining whether a plan satisfies the affordability requirement, the Internal Revenue Service recognized the likely inability of employers to ascertain the household income for each of its employees. As a result, the proposed regulations recently published by the IRS allow employers to take advantage of three safe harbor provisions.

Form W-2 Safe Harbor

Application of the Form W-2 Safe Harbor, which is determined after the calendar year on an employee-by-employee basis, takes into account the employee’s Form W-2 wages and the employee contribution.

An employer will not be assessed a penalty for an employee if the required annual contribution for the employer’s cheapest employee-only coverage plan is not more than 9.5% of that employee’s Form W-2 wages from the employer. If an employee is not offered coverage for an entire calendar year, the Form W-2 wages can be adjusted to reflect the period for which coverage was offered.

To avoid manipulation, the proposed regulations provide that the employee’s required contribution must remain consistent during the calendar year and that an employer cannot make discretionary adjustments to the required employee contribution for a pay period.

Rate of Pay Safe Harbor

Under the Rate of Pay Safe Harbor, an employer:

takes the rate of pay for each hourly employee who is eligible for coverage under the plan as of the beginning of the plan year; and
multiplies that rate by 130 hours (the benchmark for monthly full-time status) to compute the employee’s monthly wages.

If the employee’s monthly contribution amount for the cheapest employee-only coverage plan is not more than 9.5 percent of the computed monthly wages, then the coverage is considered affordable. For salaried employees, the monthly salary would be used to determine affordability.

The Rate of Pay Safe Harbor allows employers to prospectively determine affordability without having to analyze every employee’s wages and hours. However, it may only be used for those employees who did not have their hourly wages or monthly salaries reduced by the employer during the year.

Federal Poverty Line Safe Harbor

Under the Federal Poverty Line (FPL) Safe Harbor, coverage is considered affordable if the employee’s cost for the cheapest employee-only coverage plan is not more than 9.5% of the FPL for a single individual. Under the regulations, employers may use the most recently published poverty guidelines for the first day of the plan year.

These safe harbors are optional. Large employers may use one or more of these for all employees or for any reasonable category of employees, provided they are used uniformly and consistently for all employees in a category.

The IRS will be accepting comments on these proposed regulations until March 18, 2013.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through what is sure to be a bumpy ride. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about the Affordable Care Act. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.