FLSA Update: DOL Proposes Salary Increase for White-Collar Overtime Exemptions

It’s not déjà vu. The Department of Labor is trying to change the white-collar overtime exemptions …again. On March 22, 2019, the DOL published a proposed rule that would increase the minimum salary requirements for the Fair Labor Standards Act’s executive, administrative and professional overtime exemptions.

The DOL estimates that 1.3 million currently exempt employees would become nonexempt under the proposed rule. Without some form of intervention, employers will have to start paying overtime to these newly-nonexempt employees.

The proposed rule does not change the standard duties tests for exempt white-collar employees. Instead, the DOL focused primarily on updating the minimum salary and compensation levels needed to qualify for the executive, administrative and professional overtime exemptions.

Proposed Salary Level [Current Salary Level]

Weekly:               $679       [$455]

Bi-weekly:           $1,358   [$910]

Semi-Monthly:  $1,471   [$985.83]

Monthly:             $2,942   [$1,971.66]

Annually:             $35,308 [$23,660]

The proposed rule also increases the total annual compensation needed to exempt “highly compensated employees” from $100,000 to $147,414 per year. It also allows employers to use nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments (including commissions) to satisfy up to 10 percent of the standard salary level, but payments must be made on an annual or more frequent basis.

According to the DOL, salary levels needed to be updated to reflect growth in wages and salaries. The proposed salary levels, however, are lower than the salary levels required under the 2016 final rule, which was blocked by a federal court. The minimum salary needed to qualify for white-collar exemptions under the 2016 final rule was $913 per week ($47,476 per year).

The period for public comment on the proposed rule opened March 22nd and closes May 21, 2019. The DOL anticipates that the proposed rule, once finalized, will become effective in 2020. This gives employers some time to prepare, but not a lot.

Employers are once again facing uncertainty and confusion surrounding the white-collar overtime exemptions. The result is an increased risk exposure. Employment Practices Liability Insurance can protect against various employment-related claims. Limited coverage for wage and hour claims may be available.

Please contact us if you would like to learn more about employment practices liability insurance.

Fair Labor Standards Act: Wage & Hour Law Update

What is the most recent development involving Fair Labor Standards Act? Here’s a hint. It’s not the highly-publicized rise and fall of those new white-collar overtime exemption regulations. In fact, quite a bit has happened since the Department of Labor officially abandoned its fight for new white-collar regulations in late 2017.

Opinion Letters

In June 2017, the DOL announced that it would reinstate the issuance of written opinion letters to help employers and employees better understand the FLSA. These letters provide the Wage and Hour Division’s official opinion of how the FLSA applies in the specific circumstances described by the person requesting the opinion.

On January 5, 2018, the DOL made good on its promise when it re-issued seventeen FLSA-specific opinion letters, the first in nearly a decade. These letters were originally prepared in 2009 by the departing Bush administration and quickly withdrawn under the new Obama administration. Then, on April 12th, the DOL issued two new FLSA-specific opinion letters.

This new round of opinion letters covers various topics, including:

  • Compensability of frequent rest breaks required by a serious health condition;
  • Compensability of travel time;
  • Calculation of salary deductions;
  • Salary deductions for full-day absences based on hours missed; and
  • Year-end non-discretionary bonuses.

Opinion letters are significant because they can provide an affirmative defense for actions that may otherwise be unlawful under the FLSA. An employer may avoid liability for actions:

  • Taken in good faith; and
  • In conformity with and in reliance on any written regulation, order, ruling, approval or interpretation of the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division.

Tipped Employees

In December 2017, the DOL proposed new tip regulations. Under the FLSA, employers can credit tips toward their minimum wage obligation. This “tip credit” is equal to the difference between the cash wages it pays the employee (which must be at least $2.13 per hour) and the $7.25 per hour Federal minimum wage.

Under current regulations, employees must be allowed to keep all of their tips, except for tips distributed through a tip pool. However, the tip pool must be limited to employees who customarily and regularly receive tips, like servers, bartenders and bussers. This restriction applies regardless of whether an employer claims a tip credit.

The proposed regulations remove this restriction for employers that do not take a FLSA tip credit and pay a direct cash wage of at least the full Federal minimum wage. The proposed regulations do not change the rules for employers that do claim a tip credit.

Under the proposed regulations, employers who do not take a tip credit would be allowed to share tips with back-of-house workers and other employees who do not customarily and regularly receive tips. According to the DOL, this lets employers reduce wage disparities among employees who all contribute to a customer’s experience, and also incentivizes all employees to improve customers’ experience.

The period for public comment on the proposed regulations ended February 5, 2018, so we can only wait to see what the DOL does next.

The rapidly changing FLSA can put employers at serious risk. Adjusting to change takes time, but violations can happen in the blink of an eye. Employers should consider Employment Practices Liability Insurance to protect against various employment-related claims, including limited coverage for wage and hour claims.

Please contact us if you would like to learn more about protecting your business with employment practices liability insurance.

To receive regular updates about developments which may affect your business, subscribe to Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk’s weekly risk management news brief.

Federal Judge Blocks New White-Collar Overtime Regulations

A federal judge in Texas has blocked the Fair Labor Standards Act’s new white-collar overtime exemption regulations. Ten days before their effective date, District Court Judge Amos Mazzant issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily prohibits the Department of Labor from implementing and enforcing the new white-collar overtime exemption regulations. As a result, the new regulations will not be going into effect on December 1, 2016.

In May 2016, the Department of Labor revised various white-collar overtime exemption regulations to:

  • increase the minimum salary requirement from $455 per week ($23,660 annually) to $913 per week ($47,476 annually);
  • increase the minimum annual compensation requirement for the highly-compensated employee exemption from $100,000 to $134,004; and
  • create a process to automatically update the minimum salary and compensation levels every three years, beginning on January 1, 2020.

In September 2016, twenty-one states filed a lawsuit to challenge the legality of the new regulations. On the same day, more than 50 state and national business organizations filed a separate lawsuit challenging the regulations. Both cases were filed in the Eastern District of Texas and were later consolidated.

The plaintiffs filed an Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction to prevent the new regulations from going into effect on December 1, 2016. Though a number of arguments were made, Judge Mazzant, who was nominated by President Obama, ultimately determined that the DOL exceeded its delegated authority and ignored Congress’s intent by promulgating and attempting to implement the new regulations.

According to Judge Mazzant, Congress unambiguously intended the white-collar exemptions to depend on an employee’s duties rather than an employee’s salary. By significantly increasing the minimum salary level, the new regulations essentially supplant the well-established duties test. If the intent is to replace the duties test with a salary requirement, then only Congress can make the change, not the DOL.

Judge Mazzant noted that the new regulations would also be invalid because they are not based on a permissible construction of the FLSA and do not comport with Congress’s intent. The broad purpose of the white-collar exemptions was to exempt from overtime those engaged in executive, administrative and professional capacity duties. However, the DOL essentially created a de facto salary-only test by significantly increasing the minimum salary level.

Judge Mazzant ultimately concluded that the public interest is best served by a nationwide preliminary injunction that preserves the status quo until the case can be fully resolved on its merits. Since the DOL is currently prohibited from implementing and enforcing the new regulations, employers don’t have to change their wage and exemption practices for white-collar employees, at least for now.

The ultimate fate of the new regulations is uncertain. Though the preliminary injunction is temporary, this case can languish in court for more than a year. The DOL is currently considering all legal options. In the meantime, the Obama administration that initially directed the DOL to update the white-collar overtime exemption regulations will be replaced by a Trump administration that may direct the DOL otherwise.

Since the level of uncertainty and confusion surrounding the white-collar overtime exemptions has reached new heights, employers may benefit from having Employment Practices Liability Insurance to protect against various employment-related claims. Limited coverage for wage and hour claims may be available.

Please contact us if you would like to learn more about complying with the FLSA’s new (old) white collar overtime exemption regulations.

To receive regular updates about developments which may affect your business, subscribe to Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk’s weekly risk management news brief.

Florida’s Minimum Wage Will Be Going Up In 2017

On January 1, 2017, Florida’s minimum wage will be going up five cents to $8.10 per hour. The minimum wage for tipped employees, which is in addition to tips, is also going up five cents to $5.08 per hour. The Florida Minimum Wage Act, which is the result of a 2004 voter-approved amendment to the Florida Constitution, applies to those employees entitled to receive the federal minimum wage under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Florida’s minimum wage is recalculated annually on September 30th to adjust for inflation. The recalculation is based on the annual percentage change in the federal Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers for the South Region. The Florida Department of Economic Opportunity is responsible for calculating and posting the new minimum wage.

According to the Florida Supreme Court, only upward adjustments are permitted. Since becoming effective in 2005, Florida’s minimum wage has gone up almost every year.

2005 $6.15 +1.00
2006 $6.40 +0.25
2007 $6.67 +0.27
2008 $6.79 +0.12
2009 $7.21 +0.46
2010 $7.25
2011 $7.31 +0.06
2012 $7.67 +0.36
2013 $7.79 +0.12
2014 $7.93 +0.14
2015 $8.05 +0.12
2016 $8.05
2017 $8.10 +0.05

Employers are required to pay the federal minimum hourly wage or their state’s minimum hourly wage, whichever is higher. Since Florida’s 2017 minimum hourly wage will be higher than the federal minimum hourly wage of $7.25, Florida employees entitled to minimum wage cannot be paid less than $8.10 per hour.

Florida employers must prominently display a minimum wage poster in a conspicuous and accessible place wherever minimum wage employees are employed. This poster must notify employees of the minimum wage and of their rights and protections under Florida’s Minimum Wage Act.

Employers who violate Florida’s Minimum Wage Act can be sued by their employees. However, employees must first notify their employer, in writing, of their intent to sue. This notice must:

  • Identify the minimum hourly wage to which the employee claims entitlement;
  • Provide the actual or estimated work dates and hours for which payment is sought; and
  • State the total amount of alleged unpaid wages.

After receiving such a notice, an employer has 15 calendar days to pay the total amount of unpaid wages or resolve the claim to the employee’s satisfaction. Otherwise, the employee will be allowed to file a lawsuit for unpaid minimum wages. The Florida Attorney General can also bring a civil action against employers. Each willful violation can result in a $1,000 fine.

Dealing with state and federal wage and hour laws can be hard. The new white collar overtime exemption regulations will only make things harder. To protect against employment practices liability claims, employers should implement a training program and explore their options for insuring against wage and hour claims.

Please contact us for more information about protecting your business from employment-related liabilities.

To receive regular updates about developments which may affect your business, please subscribe to Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk’s weekly Risk Management Newsletters.

Now What? Preparing for the New FLSA White Collar Overtime Exemptions

On December 1, 2016, it will be more expensive for employers to take advantage of the Fair Labor Standards Act’s (FLSA) so-called white collar overtime exemptions. Since FLSA violations have always been expensive, employers should begin the process of determining whether and to what extent they will be affected by the new overtime exemption regulations .

The new rules focus primarily on the minimum salary and compensation levels needed to qualify for the FLSA’s executive, administrative, professional, and computer employee overtime exemptions. Employers can ask the following questions to determine the potential impact of the new overtime rules.

Are there any employees classified as exempt under one of the FLSA’s white collar overtime exemptions? If no, you should not be affected by the higher standard salary levels under the new rules. If yes, move on to the next question.

Do any of these employees ever work more than 40 hours in a workweek? If no, you should not be affected by the higher standard salary levels under the new rules. If yes, move on to the next question.

Do any of these employees earn a salary of less than $913 per week? (This works out to $1,826 biweekly, $1,978 semimonthly, $3,956 monthly or $47,476 annually.) If no, you should not be affected by the higher standard salary levels under the new rules. If yes, exemption classifications and compensation practices will need to be adjusted before December 1, 2016 to avoid violating the new rules.

Various adjustments can be made to ensure compliance under the new rules. However, the most appropriate adjustment(s) will likely depend on each employer’s specific circumstances, such as the number of newly-nonexempt employees, their salaries, how often they work overtime and how much overtime they work.

Depending on their circumstances, employers may implement one or more of the following adjustments.

Increase Salaries. The obvious adjustment, and the one likely envisioned by those enacting the new rules, would be to increase the salaries of exempt white collar employees to no less than $913 per week. Though this may be the simplest and least disruptive adjustment, it may also be the most unrealistic. Though salary increases for some employees may be nominal, they can be more than double for others.

[Remember, employees are not exempt simply because their salaries satisfy the increased salary levels under the new rules. Their primary job duties must also involve the kind of work associated with the specific white collar exemption. Employees must satisfy the minimum salary level requirement and the applicable “standard duties test” to be exempt.]

Pay Newly-Nonexempt Employees Overtime Compensation. The alternative to increasing salaries is to re-classify these exempt white collar employees as overtime-eligible employees. If they work more than 40 hours in a workweek, they must be paid one and a half times their regular rate. As with other nonexempt employees, employers must track the number of hours worked each day and the total hours worked each workweek by newly-nonexempt employees. For many, this will be an entirely new experience and will take some getting used to.

This may not be a problem for employees who rarely work or who work very little overtime. These employees can continue working the same number of hours. Though employers will pay more for occasional overtime work, they may still be paying substantially less than $913 per week. The same cannot be said about employees who regularly work or who work a lot of overtime. The cost of paying time and a half to these employees could be very high, and may even approach $913 per week.

Prohibit Overtime. Newly-nonexempt employees can be prohibited from working overtime. If no overtime is worked, no overtime compensation is required. This option may be simple, but it may not be easy. Exempt employees typically work more than 40 hours in a workweek because they have more than 40 hours of work to do. This work must still get done, but someone else will have to do it.

Adjust Personnel, Schedules or Assignments. Those who prohibit overtime may have to make various operational adjustments. For example, workload distribution and workforce scheduling may need to be adjusted to compensate for the loss of overtime work. In some cases, new employees may need to be hired to make up for any lost productivity.

Adjust Wages. If newly-nonexempt employees are allowed to continue working overtime as always, employers will end up paying more money for the same amount of work. Reallocating regular wages and overtime compensation is a way to keep the hours worked by and the amount paid to newly-nonexempt employees largely the same. However, employers may not reduce an employee’s hourly wage below the highest applicable minimum wage (federal, state, or local) or continually adjust wages each workweek in order to manipulate the regular rate.

Employers cannot wait too long to begin planning for the upcoming change. It takes time to properly implement organizational adjustments to exemption classifications and compensation practices, particularly if they are substantial or complex. With all the publicity surrounding the new white collar overtime exemption rules, it’s probably safe to assume that violations will be noticed not only by those employees who are affected by the new rules, but by the Department of Labor too.

Since the Final Rule is sure to bring a level uncertainty and confusion, employers may benefit from having Employment Practices Liability Insurance to protect against various employment-related claims. Limited coverage for wage and hour claims may be available.

Please contact us if you would like to learn more about complying with the FLSA’s new white collar overtime exemption rules.

To receive regular updates about developments which may affect your business, subscribe to Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk’s weekly risk management news brief.

Is Your Business Ready for New FLSA White-Collar Overtime Rules?

Over two years ago, the possibility of new overtime rules for white-collar employees under the Fair Labor Standard Act (FLSA) first appeared on the horizon. Last year, the Department of Labor (DOL) released proposed revisions to overtime exemption regulations, including those for executive, administrative and professional employees. Today, that once looming possibility is looking more like a fast approaching reality. Fast, as in possibly by mid-July, fast.

On March 14, 2016, the DOL submitted its final version of the revised overtime exemption regulations to the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. Once the OMB completes its review, the final regulations will be published. After that, it’s just a matter of time. Unfortunately, there are some details we still don’t know about the final regulations. Minor details, really, like what they are or when they will go into effect.

What will be different under the final regulations?

No one really knows. The final regulations will not be made public until the OMB completes its review, and few details have leaked or been disclosed. Many expect the final regulations to be identical or very similar to the proposed regulations issued in July 2015, including the DOL’s proposal to:

  • Increase the minimum salary requirement for white collar exemptions from $455 per week ($23,660/year) to $921 per week ($47,892/year);
  • Increase the minimum compensation requirement for the Highly Compensated Employee exemption from $100,000 to $122,148 per year; and
  • Automatically update the new minimum salary and compensation levels annually.

It’s possible that the final regulations may include additional changes, particularly the duties test used to determine eligibility under the current white-collar exemptions . In the proposed regulations, the DOL asked for comments about whether changes need to be made to the duties tests. Though the DOL specifically stated that it’s not proposing any specific regulatory changes to the duties test, we don’t know for sure.

When will the final regulations become effective?

This is also uncertain, but it may be sooner than initially expected. The Solicitor of Labor has indicated that the effective date of the final regulations will be 60 days after publication. But, before they can be published, they must be reviewed. The OMB generally has 90 days to review regulations, which would put the deadline near the middle of June. However, because of the upcoming election, the middle of May is probably the OMB’s real deadline. Here’s why.

Under the Congressional Review Act (CRA), Congress is generally given 60 days to review and disapprove a major rule, like the DOL’s new overtime exemption regulations. However, the CRA makes an exception for “midnight rules” that are issued toward the end of an administration. If a rule is issued too late, the 60-day review period essentially resets to give the next session of Congress an opportunity to review and disapprove the rule.

The current administration does not want this to happen, so the OMB must complete its review before the date on which the CRA’s reset provision is triggered. Otherwise, the new overtime exemption regulations would be at the mercy of the next Congress and a new president.

According to calculations by the Congressional Research Service, this date is estimated to be May 16, 2016.

This date was estimated using projected congressional schedules, so it may change. Nevertheless, if we assume the final regulations are published by May 16, 2016, and add 60 days, the new regulations could become effective around July 15, 2016, maybe even sooner!

Or, maybe later. On March 17, 2016, the Protecting Workplace Advancement and Opportunity Act was introduced as a bill. If passed, this law would essentially void any changes made to the white-collar overtime exemptions. Before proposing any new changes, the law would also require the DOL to undertake a comprehensive analysis of how changing overtime regulations would impact employers, including small businesses.

In the meantime, potentially significant changes to overtime pay requirements for white-collar employees may soon be here. How can employers prepare? Unfortunately, plans cannot be finalized until the final regulations are released, but employers can use the July 2015 proposed regulations as a guide to begin developing preliminary plans. In case there are any surprises, these plans should be flexible and capable of adapting to possible contingencies.

The risk of employment-related lawsuits, particularly those involving overtime under the FLSA, is nothing new for employers. But, the prospect of new rules, and their uncertainty, is expected to increase that risk significantly. Employment Practices Liability Insurance can protect against various employment-related claims, and limited coverage for wage and hour claims may also be available.

Please contact us if you would like to learn more about protecting your business with employment practices liability insurance.

To receive regular updates about developments which may affect your business, subscribe to Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk’s weekly risk management news brief.

New Health Insurance Notice Requirements for Employers

Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is moving beyond its traditional role as the nation’s principal wage and hour law. In addition to establishing minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping and youth employment standards, the FLSA now deals with health insurance.

Under the amended FLSA, employers must notify employees that:

  • Affordable Insurance Exchanges exist, along with a description of the services provided by Exchanges and how to request assistance from an Exchange
  • If their employer’s health plan pays less than 60% of allowed costs the employee may be eligible for a premium tax credit and a cost sharing reduction if the employee purchases a qualified health plan through an Exchange
  • If the employee purchases a qualified health plan through the Exchange, the employee may lose the employer contribution (if any) to any health benefits plan offered by the employer

Employers must distribute this notice to every current employee by March 1, 2013. Employees hired after this date must receive their notice upon being hired.

The precise form and content of the notice, as well as acceptable means for providing the notice, are not yet certain. The law states that employers must provide notice “in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Secretary.” Presumably, these regulations will clarify what should be included in the notice and how it can be provided to employees.

Despite the current lack of regulations, it is reasonable to assume that the FLSA’s broad definition of “employer” means that most employers will need to comply with the new notice requirement. Similarly, the FLSA’s broad definition of “employee” means that every employee, regardless of status, will likely be entitled to receive this notice.

Consequently, employers need to be ready to comply with the notice requirement by March 1, 2013, especially since the penalty for violating this requirement is unknown.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to guiding you through what is sure to be a bumpy ride. Check back with us periodically for future informational updates about health care reform. If you have specific questions about the Act or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

Workers’ Compensation and Telecommuting: Enjoying the Benefits While Controlling the Risks

Although telecommuting is not a new phenomenon, it has certainly gained traction since the turn of the century. According to the American Community Survey, which is conducted annually by the U.S. Census Bureau, the employee work-at-home, or WAH, population grew 61% from 2005 to 2009. Though the past few years have shown a small decline, which is generally attributed to a decline in the overall labor market, the outlook suggests significant growth over the next five years.

A report prepared by the Telework Research Network identifies various factors that will fuel the projected increase in telecommuting in the coming years, such as:

  • Forty-five percent of the U.S. workforce has a job that can be performed, at least partially, by telecommuting;
  • Improving communications and collaboration technologies;
  • Improved and expanded high-speed broadband internet access and the proliferation of web-based applications;
  • Increasing sophistication in managing and working with distributed (distance) workers;
  • Continued pressures on employers to reduce overhead costs, including office space, management, and operations;
  • Escalating fuel prices and increasing pressure on employers to reduce their carbon footprint; and
  • Continued emphasis on cost containment and bottom-line performance.

Despite the many benefits, telecommuting does create unique risks, some of which can be significant. What many employers fail to realize, or adequately consider, is that a telecommuting employee’s home will generally be considered that employee’s workplace.

The consequence of this distinction is that many employment-related laws follow a telecommuting employee home. Since a telecommuting employee is still an employee, employers must ensure compliance with all applicable laws governing their entire workforce, including those who telecommute, and each employment-related law presents its own unique challenges.

Consider the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), for example, which is the federal law governing minimum wage and overtime compensation. Since an employee covered by the FLSA does not forfeit his or her rights merely by telecommuting, employers must be prepared to control the manner in which telecommuters perform their work to prevent wage and hour violations.

How, for example, does an employer monitor the number of hours worked, keep track of start- and stop-times, prevent unauthorized overtime, or prevent employees from working off the clock? The number of wage and hour claims filed annually reflects that these tasks pose a challenge for employers dealing with their traditional employees. Needless to say, ensuring FLSA compliance with telecommuting employees can prove even more challenging.

In addition to the FLSA, employers must ensure compliance with various other laws, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. However, one of the more challenging legal obstacles facing those who employ telecommuters involves workers’ compensation.

Workers’ compensation generally provides benefits to employees who have suffered an accidental compensable injury or death arising out of work performed in the course and scope of employment. Despite some statutory variations among the states, an employee who suffers an accidental workplace illness or injury will typically be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits.

This general rule also applies to those employees who telecommute. However, telecommuters create a unique challenge because they are working at home without direct supervision or observation. Consider how difficult it would be for an employer to determine whether a filing cabinet drawer broke an employee’s hand when the employee was filing documents, or whether that same hand was caught in the drier while the employee was doing a load of laundry between work-related telephone tasks.

If a lack of supervision or witnesses makes it difficult, or impossible, to conclusively establish the cause of a workplace injury, then an employer may be unable to detect and defend against false or fraudulent workers’ compensation claims. When dealing with workers’ compensation matters involving telecommuting employees, the vulnerability to fraudulent claims may be the biggest risk faced by employers.

Since it is impossible to prevent all work-related injuries, employers must decrease the likelihood that a telecommuting employee will file a false or fraudulent workers’ compensation claim by eliminating the opportunity to do so. This is typically accomplished by implementing policies and procedures designed to control an employee’s workday in a manner designed to decrease the likelihood of fraud.

Since these policies and procedures must be tailored to accommodate an employer’s specific needs and resources, creating a one-size-fits-all approach is not an option. Nevertheless, those employers currently employing telecommuters, or those who may do so in the future, should consider the following suggestions.

  • Understand that the applicability of employment-related laws does not change merely because an employee telecommutes. Accordingly, it is necessary to consider each laws requirements, how those requirements are controlled and managed for traditional employees, and how to best go about controlling those requirements for telecommuting employees.
  • Understand that not all positions or jobs can be accomplished by a telecommuting employee. Appropriate positions generally involve mainly electronic documents, telephone communication, and minimal supervision.
  • Establish policies and procedures, possibly even a customized employee handbook or agreement that is specifically tailored for telecommuting employees. Given the different dynamics and risks, traditional policies or procedures may not be sufficient to deal with telecommuting employees.
  • Require telecommuting employees to immediately report any injury or illness they consider work related. Any failures to abide by this policy should raise a red flag. For example, if an employee is unable to reach his or her supervisor to report an injury because the office was closed, this fact could make it easier for an employer to establish that the injury did not arise out of work because it occurred after-hours.
  • Establish a fixed schedule for work, meals, and breaks. If an injury occurs when the employee was not supposed to be working, it makes it more difficult for an employee to claim the incident was related to work. Various techniques, such as computer/network logins, telephone use monitoring, and video devices, can be used to track an employee’s adherence to schedules.
  • Provide the necessary training for telecommuting employees to reduce the likelihood of a work-related incident. The training should be tailored to each employee’s specific job functions. Generalized training in ergonomics, back safety, etc. should also be considered.
  • Confirm that the telecommuting employee has a separate work area to help define, and determine, when the employee is working or “on the job.”
  • Perform an inspection of the employee’s work area to ensure maximum safety and to deter or eliminate clutter or hazards that are not related to work.
  • Provide telecommuting employees with the proper equipment to perform their work safely and efficiently. This equipment may include computers, furniture, tools, electronic devices, extension cords, fire extinguishers, smoke detectors, etc.
  • Develop policies or guidelines regarding the manner and extent to which the telecommuting employee must communicate with his or her supervisor or manager.
  • Be cautious of letting new or inexperienced employees telecommute.
  • Be selective when deciding which employees should be permitted to telecommute. Only those employees who have a history of good judgment, responsibility, dedication, motivation, organizational ability, discipline, loyalty, and productivity should be authorized to telecommute.
  • Employers electing to make telecommuting a part of their organizational profile will likely enjoy numerous benefits. However, for those employers who fail to appreciate the significance of their decision, these benefits may quickly be negated by the risks that accompany an employment relationship that physically separates the employer from the employee.
  • Since it is likely that the risks associated with a telecommuting workforce will be greater than those associated with a traditional workforce, shouldn’t the employer’s efforts to control those risks be greater too?
  • If you would like to receive a sample Telecommuting Agreement, please contact us.