Why You Should Control Your Road Rage

Though many have heard about road rage, few truly grasp the problem. Many people don’t know that:

  • More than 1,000 deaths have been attributed to road rage since 2007
  • Over a 5 year period, reports of extremely angered drivers have doubled, increasing by 170%
  • A review of more than 10,000 incidents by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety found that road rage resulted in at least 218 murders and 12,610 injuries

Another thing many people don’t know is that their auto insurance will not cover bodily injury or property damage caused by their road rage. In fact, insurance companies will routinely deny these claims, not because of a specific ‘road rage’ policy exclusion, but because of the nature of road rage itself.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration defines road rage as an assault with a motor vehicle by the operator of one motor vehicle on the occupants of another motor vehicle. In other words, road rage is viewed as an intentional act. As far as insurance companies are concerned, this makes all the difference.

Auto insurance typically covers ‘accidents’ that result in bodily injury or property damage. So the question becomes whether road rage can be considered an accident. One court recently said no, an accident is never present when a deliberate act is performed. Since road rage does not qualify as an accident, the court ruled in favor of the insurance company. Given their intentional nature, insurance companies can also deny road rage claims under a policy’s intentional act exclusion.

Since the lack of insurance coverage affects perpetrators and their victims, it is important to avoid road rage incidents whenever possible. The AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety suggests the following:

  • Don’t Offend: avoid cutting other drivers off, driving slow in the left lane, tailgating or making gestures
  • Don’t Engage: steer clear of aggressive drivers, avoid eye contact and get help if necessary
  • Adjust Your Attitude: forget winning, put yourself in the other driver’s shoes and control your own anger

If you would like more information about auto insurance or would like help getting the coverage you need, please contact us.

If you would like to subscribe to our newsletters please click here.

Shopping for Insurance: Quality versus Cost

People typically purchase insurance because they have to, not because they want to. For the most part, consumers are happy to obtain the minimum required insurance coverage at the lowest price they can find. That is, until a claim comes along. Only then do they discover that buying the cheapest insurance available wasn’t such a bargain after all.

The quality versus cost argument is nothing new especially when it comes to insurance. Consumers who pay less tend to get less, whether in the form of coverages, limits or financial security. And, when people choose cost over quality, it usually means they are uninformed about what they really need.

As a full-service independent insurance agency, it is our job to help our clients understand their insurance needs. We evaluate, compare and quote various options from multiple insurance companies so that our clients have the right information before making a decision. Though many still choose cost over quality, it is important that they understand what they may be sacrificing.

Low Premiums

Would you rather have automobile insurance that protects you from damage caused by someone who is uninsured or underinsured? Uninsured Motorist Coverage is commonly excluded from a policy to reduce the premium. Rejecting GAP coverage or electing non-stacked coverage are other ways to save money. But these choices come with a risk. When shopping for insurance it’s better to determine what coverage is desired, see how much that coverage would cost, and work with an independent insurance agent to help get the coverage you need at a cost you can afford.

Financial Stability

Although cost is important, the financial strength of an insurance company may be more important. Financially weak insurance companies are more likely to become insolvent or go bankrupt, which means that their policyholders are less likely to get their claims paid. Though purchasing insurance from a financially weak company may be cheaper, how valuable is the money saved on premium if there is no money to pay a claim? An independent insurance agent can help you evaluate the financial stability of the insurance companies you are considering.

Customer Service

Insurance companies don’t typically assign an agent to their customers. Each time you call you speak to a different person which means you have to explain your situation over and over. Look for an agent that offers personalized service. Those are the agents who are willing to go the extra mile to get you what you need. For example, at Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, our commercial clients enjoy complimentary access to our risk management services to help them manage the risks associated with owning a business.

A solid understanding of your insurance needs is the key to overcoming the quality versus cost argument. An experienced and reputable independent insurance agent can help you purchase insurance that is both economical and effective.

If you would like more information about our insurance products, please contact us.

If you would like to subscribe to our newsletters please click here.

What is a Certificate of Insurance?

Certificates of Insurance are documents provided by Agents to verify the existence of insurance coverage. They are commonly used when an agreement or contract requires a party to maintain specific types of insurance. For example, a Certificate of Insurance can be used when:

  • A general contractor wants to verify that its subcontractor has the statutorily required workers’ compensation insurance;
  • A mortgage lender wants to verify that the homeowner has sufficient property insurance;
  • A commercial landlord wants to verify that its tenant has all the insurance coverage required by the lease; or
  • A homeowner wants to verify that its lawn service company has general liability insurance.

Certificates of Insurance are issued to the certificate holder—the person or entity that needs to verify insurance coverage. Though common and relatively straightforward, there is quite a bit of confusion about what Certificates of Insurance do, and more importantly, do not do.

A Certificate of Insurance provides a superficial snapshot of insurance coverage that is in place at the time it is created. Contrary to what many believe, Certificates of Insurance:

  • Are NOT insurance policies.
  • Do NOT provide certificate holders with any rights under the insured’s policies. This means certificate holders cannot file a claim or request a defense under the insured’s policies.
  • Do NOT amend, extend or alter the coverage provided by the insured’s policies. This can only be accomplished with an endorsement, rider or amendment to the policy.
  • Do NOT create a contract between the insurance company and the certificate holder.
  • Do NOT guarantee that insurance coverages listed on a Certificate of Insurance will continue in the future. A Certificate of Insurance issued today may not be accurate tomorrow.
  • Are provided for informational purposes ONLY.

Though there are various Certificate of Insurance forms, those developed by ACORD (Association for Cooperative Operations Research and Development) are widely used to provide specific information about existing insurance coverage, such as:

  • the insurance companies issuing the policy
  • the policy numbers
  • effective dates
  • types of insurance (ex. general liability, automobile, workers’ compensation, property)
  • policy limits

These forms also provide a space to add additional comments or conditions. This is where problems may arise if an insured or certificate holder wants to add specific language to their Certificates of Insurance. For example, a certificate holder may want to state that there is an additional insured under the policy, or an insured may want the certificate to state that any obligation to indemnify the certificate holder is covered by the policy.

If such statements happen to be true, it is not because they were typed on the certificate. Remember that Certificates of Insurance do not affect, extend, or change the insurance policy, so any incorrect or contradictory statements are meaningless to the insurance company. They can, however, be grounds for a costly lawsuit, so an experienced insurance agent should be used when issuing or receiving Certificates of Insurance.

If you would like to learn more about dealing with Certificates of Insurance or how we can help, please contact us.

If you would like to subscribe to our newsletters please click here.

Understanding Auto Insurance

Whether purchasing a new policy or determining if a loss is covered under an existing policy, it helps to have a basic understanding of how auto insurance works. Here is a brief explanation of some common auto insurance concepts and coverages that you can use to determine if you have the protection you need.

Collision coverage pays for car damage caused by a collision with another car or an object. This type of coverage is typically required by finance companies.

Comprehensive coverage pays for losses caused by something other than a collision, such as theft, vandalism, falling objects, fire and weather (wind, hail, etc.). This type of insurance coverage is also known as Comp or Other-Than-Collision coverage.

Liability insurance covers damage to others for which the insured is responsible. There are two main types of auto liability coverage, both of which are generally required by state law. Bodily Injury (BI) Liability insurance covers damages resulting from injury or death, such as medical and funeral expenses, loss of income, pain and suffering. Property Damage (PD) Liability insurance covers damage to the property of others, such as cars, mailboxes, trees and fences. Liability coverage does not pay for the insured’s own bodily injury or property damage.

Personal Injury Protection (PIP or No-Fault) insurance pays for injuries sustained in an auto accident. In addition to the insured, PIP may also cover family members, passengers and household residents. PIP insurance generally provides benefits for medical expenses, loss of income, funeral expenses and other similar expenses, regardless of who is at fault. The requirement to carry PIP insurance and the benefits that must be paid by an insurance company vary by state.

Uninsured Motorist (UM) coverage pays for an insured’s bodily injury and/or property damage that is caused by an uninsured motorist. UM insurance allows an insured to collect from his or her own insurance company. Underinsured Motorist (UIM) coverage is a similar type of coverage that pays for an insured’s bodily injury and/or property damage caused by a motorist with insufficient insurance.

Stacking is a way to increase a policy’s uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage limits. If UM or UIM coverage is stacked, then the policy’s limits will be multiplied by the number of vehicles covered under the policy. For example, an insured with UM limits of 50/100 ($50,000 per person/$100,000 per accident) and three covered vehicles can essentially increase her UM limits to 150/300 by electing to stack her coverage. The manner in which an insured must accept or reject the stacking of limits is often governed by state law.

Guaranteed Auto Protection (GAP) insurance pays the difference between the current outstanding balance on a car loan or lease and the actual cash value of the car. This coverage can prove valuable when the amount owed on the car is more than the value of the car when it rendered a total loss after an accident. This would be the case, for example, when a new car is totaled the day after it was purchased and driven off the dealer’s lot.

Deductible is the amount an insurance company will deduct from the loss before paying up to the policy’s limits. Though insureds typically have options when choosing a deductible, state laws and finance agreements often have specific deductible requirements.

Coverage Limit is the amount an insurance company will pay in the event of a claim. Those who purchase only the minimum coverage limit required by their state’s law are probably underinsured. Coverage limits of $100,000/$300,000 are generally recommended.

If you would like more information about comparing and obtaining personal and commercial auto insurance coverage, please contact us.

If you would like to subscribe to our newsletters please click here.

Will business owners buy insurance online?

Insurance companies such as Geico and Progressive started selling personal insurance online over a decade ago. So is it safe to assume that business insurance can also be sold online?

We decided to explore this endeavour and we’re not the only ones. Plenty of insurance agencies offer business insurance, but very few can offer clients an online quote.

Just because the tool is out there doesn’t mean business owners will use it. Getting a quote for business insurance is significantly more complicated than obtaining a personal quote. Some of the other agencies that are offering business quotes are approaching it quite differently than we did.

Hiscox is targeting small business with a page on their site dedicated to explaining the various types of insurance coverage small business owners need. Apogee lists the types of insurance they can quote instantly and features a video tutorial of how to use their quoting tool. Our tool lists all the instant quotes we offer including Property and Liability Quotes, Professional Liability Quotes, Business Auto Quotes, and many more.

The introduction of this tool to our website also created the need for a complete redesign. We call ourselves a full-service independent insurance agency and creating this tool made us realize the possibility for an online marketplace. If clients can get quotes online they should be able to service their policies online as well. That’s why we also created a service page which allows clients to manage their policies online

If successful, online quotes for business insurance could be a big game changer. It will be interesting to see how many more agencies begin offering business quotes online. Get a quote and let us know what you think.

At Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk, we are committed to offering you a seamless insurance experience. Check back with us periodically for informational updates about insurance news. If you have specific questions about our instant quoting tool or if you are ready to take action and would like to see how Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk can help, contact us.

If you’d like to subscribe to our weekly newsletters please click here.

What is “No-Fault” Auto Insurance?

No-Fault Automobile Insurance is designed to reduce the overall cost of insurance by making quick payments to individuals injured in an accident regardless of fault and by limiting the right to file lawsuits after the accident. Though relatively straightforward, the concept of No-Fault insurance is commonly misunderstood because there is a lack of uniformity among the minority of states that operate under a No-Fault system.

In its purest form, No-Fault Automobile Insurance, which is also known as Personal Injury Protection (PIP) or First-Party Benefits, allows policyholders to recover damages directly from their insurance companies even if the accident was their fault. In exchange for automatic insurance benefits, those injured in the accident cannot sue for damages under tort law.

This “pure” form of No-Fault insurance does not exist. Instead, approximately a quarter of the states adopted their own laws by adding No-Fault type provisions into their traditional insurance system.

In these states, individuals injured in an accident can typically recover damages from their own insurance company even if they were at fault, but the amount they can recover is limited by statute. The kinds of damages are generally limited to medical reimbursements, lost wages and other out-of-pocket expenses. Non-pecuniary damages, such as pain and suffering, cannot be recovered.

These states also allow lawsuits if the injuries meet a minimum threshold of severity. The minimum severity required to file a lawsuit, which can vary by state, can be expressed as a verbal threshold that defines the seriousness of the injury (“severe and permanent”) or a monetary threshold based on medical costs incurred.

Other states have their own variations of No-Fault Automobile Insurance, such as:

  • Add-On: Some states allow drivers to add insurance coverage allowing them to receive benefits from their own insurance company regardless of fault while preserving their right to sue in tort.
  • Choice: In these states, drivers may choose a No-Fault Automobile Insurance policy or a traditional policy.

With all the possible variations, including changes to existing laws, it is easy to see why No-Fault Automobile Insurance is often misunderstood. Nevertheless, when it comes to automobile insurance, it is important to know what the law requires and what the law provides.

If you would like more information about No-Fault Automobile Insurance, or if you would like to discuss your insurance needs, contact us.

For an online auto insurance quote please click here.

Changes to Florida’s Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Coverage Requirements Become Effective on July 1, 2012

Florida’s Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law requires motorists to carry at least $10,000 of no-fault insurance. This insurance requirement, known as personal injury protection (PIP) coverage, has existed in Florida since 1972. To make sure that those injured in an auto accident quickly get money to treat their injuries, the law requires a driver’s insurance company pay up to $10,000 for medical bills and lost wages, no matter who is at fault.

Despite its intent, many believe the PIP law was doing more harm than good. A 2011 report prepared by Florida’s Office of Insurance Regulation noted that over the past several years the frequency and severity of PIP claims has increased significantly, even though the number of Florida drivers has remained stable and the number of accidents has decreased.

According to the report:

  • The number of PIP claims opened or recorded in 2010 increased by 28 percent since 2006.
  • From 2006-2010, the number of PIP lawsuits against insurers pending at year end increased by 387 percent.
  • From 2008 to 2010, PIP benefits paid by insurers increased by 70 percent ($1.43 billion to $2.37 billion).
  • Based on current trends, a 19 percent increase in PIP claims paid, a nine percent increase in claim severity, and a 29 percent increase in pure premium can be expected this year.

Touted as a measure to reduce insurance premiums and combat fraud (Florida ranks first nationally in staged accidents), House Bill 119 was passed by the Florida legislature on March 9, 2012. The bill’s new measures take effect on July 1, 2012.

House Bill 119 includes many significant changes to the current law, including:

  • Requiring those injured in motor vehicle accidents who are seeking no-fault medical benefits to receive initial treatment and care within 14 days from specified providers;
  • Making up to $10,000 in medical benefits available for emergency medical conditions and up to $2,500 for non-emergency medical conditions;
  • Requiring insurers to make rate filings by October 1, 2012, and January 1, 2014, decreasing premium rates by at least 10 percent and 25 percent, respectively;
  • Providing that the PIP funeral benefit of $5,000 is in addition to medical and disability benefits;
  • Excluding massage and acupuncture from covered medical benefits;
  • Requiring health care clinics that seek PIP reimbursement to be licensed, with specified exceptions;
  • Authorizing a direct-support organization to combat motor vehicle insurance fraud;
  • Amending the PIP schedule of maximum charges, requiring insurers to include the schedule in their forms, and permitting the use of Medicare coding policies;
  • Providing that an insurer’s failure to timely pay PIP claims as a general business practice is an unfair and deceptive trade practice;
  • Tolling the PIP payment period when fraud is reasonably suspected;
  • Requiring insureds to comply with all policy terms, including requests for examination under oath;
  • Creating a rebuttable presumption that the failure to appear for two mental or physical examinations constitutes an “unreasonable refusal” to submit to examination;
  • Prohibiting the use of contingency risk multipliers; providing guidelines for judges to consider in determining whether the amount of an attorney fee award is appropriate;
  • Revoking the license of health care practitioners found guilty of insurance fraud for five years;
  • Amending crash report forms;
  • Specifying certain actions that constitute fraud; and
  • Appropriating $200,000 from the Insurance Regulatory Trust Fund to retain an independent consultant to determine the expected savings from this legislation.

Proponents of the bill state that it adequately targets those items driving PIP costs, and, consequently, that consumers should realize savings on their no-fault premiums. However, it is uncertain whether House Bill 119 will achieve such a result.

Though insurers are required to submit rate filings reflecting decreased premiums over the next few years, the bill requires those failing to sufficiently reduce their premiums to submit a detailed explanation of the insurer’s failure to achieve the required rate reduction. The extent to which these explanations will be scrutinized by regulators remains to be seen.

As is often the case with new laws, time is needed to determine whether actual reform will follow the legal reform.

If you would like more information about PIP reform, or if you would like to discuss any other insurance or risk management matters, please contact us.

When New Cars are Totally Lost: Closing the GAP

Driving a new car off the dealer’s lot and onto the open road can be exciting. For many new owners, however, the excitement is often tempered by the fear that their car will sustain significant damage while it is still nearly new. When a new or newer car is damaged, the real concern is the gap between the amount of money owed on the car and the amount an insurance policy will pay if the new car is deemed a total loss. Those wishing to limit the financial consequences of such a gap typically do so by purchasing some form of Guaranteed Auto Protection, or GAP.

In the event of a total loss, GAP is designed to pay the difference between the current outstanding balance on the car loan or lease, and the actual cash value of the vehicle, which is what an insurance policy will typically after a loss. In some cases, this gap can represent a significant amount of money. Importantly, this gap develops the instant the new car is driven off the lot.

Once a car is purchased and driven off the dealer’s lot, it can no longer be sold at the retail price. Indeed, a new car owner suffering from buyer’s remorse after only a few miles will soon discover that his or her car is no longer worth the original retail price. Rather, the dealer will negotiate the return of the used car on a wholesale basis, which can be significantly less than retail. And, while cars depreciate throughout their useful life, the decline in value is greatest during the first year, and can equal between 15 and 25 percent of the price of the car, with most of the depreciation occurring during the first few months.

Consequently, the rate at which a new car depreciates is typically greater than the rate at which a financed car is paid off. As a result, the owner of a new car will owe more than the car is worth until enough payments have been made to catch up with the initial depreciation. Until then, the owner will be upside down on the loan, and therefore exposed to the risk caused by the gap.

To illustrate the risk, let’s look at John, who purchased his new car for $40,000, but who did not purchase GAP coverage. Since his down payment was only enough to cover the cost of the fees and taxes, John was required to take out a loan for the full purchase price of $40,000. Before the car was destroyed by a fire, John was able to make three monthly payments, thereby reducing the balance of the car loan to $38,500.

Due to depreciation, the insurance company set the actual cash value of John’s car at $32,000. After subtracting the $500 deductible, John will receive $31,500 from his insurance company. The difference between the loan balance ($38,500) and the amount paid by the insurance company ($31,500) is the gap. Since John is still obligated to repay the loan’s balance to the bank, the gap is going to cost John $7,000.

This is the risk caused by the gap, and as illustrated by John’s example, it can be a significant risk. Had John purchased GAP coverage, the $7,000 gap would have been covered for him. However, John is not the only one who should have purchased GAP coverage. GAP coverage should be seriously considered by anyone doing one or more of the following:

  • Leasing their car;
  • Financing for 60 months or more;
  • Driving more than 15,000 miles per year;
  • Making a down payment of 20% or less; and
  • Rolling negative equity from an old car into a new car.

While the decision to purchase GAP coverage should be easy, choosing the best coverage can be a bit more complicated. Unfortunately, the regulation of GAP products is not always uniform or straightforward. In fact, the extent to which a GAP product is regulated depends in large part on who is selling it.

For example, many people incorrectly assume that GAP is always an insurance policy. A GAP product can be a contract, rather than an insurance policy, in which a creditor agrees to waive a customer’s liability for payment in the event the debt (the loan balance) exceeds the value of the collateral (the car). For example, a Florida statute, which specifically authorizes the use of “Guaranteed Asset Protection” products, expressly exempts them from regulation under Florida’s Insurance Code.

If a specific GAP product is not considered an insurance policy, then a purchaser may not enjoy the protection that is generally available to consumers under a state’s insurance laws. Specific policy forms, including exclusions, may not be regulated. Additionally, the cost of the product, even if it is referred to as a premium, may not be regulated by the state, thereby increasing the possibility of unfair or abusive pricing. Alternatively, if GAP coverage is being provided by an insurance company, then the lack of regulation by a state’s insurance department should not be a concern.

The absence of a uniform GAP policy or contract means that particular attention must be paid to exclusions found in the document to make sure there are no surprises. Though there are variations, GAP products contain numerous exclusions or limitations of coverage, including those for overdue payments, excessive mileage for leased cars, negative equity rolled over from prior loans, wear and tear deductions, and equipment upgrades.

Given the numerous, and sometimes significant variations among GAP products, as well as the absence of uniform regulation of such products, there are many potential pitfalls for consumers. The best way to avoid these pitfalls, while at the same time increasing the scope of protection afforded by a GAP product, is to work with an experienced insurance agent when purchasing or leasing a new car. This advice holds true even if GAP coverage is being offered at the car dealership, so prices and coverage terms can be compared.

If you would like more information about GAP coverage, please contact us.

Do I Need Rental Car Insurance?

Even after learning that the mid-sized car he reserved was unavailable, Jerry Seinfeld did not hesitate when asked whether he would like to purchase insurance for the remaining rental car. “Yeah, you better give me the insurance because I’m gonna beat the hell out of this car.”

Though this dialogue is fictional, the situation is not. Unfortunately, many of those asked about rental car insurance simply do not know how to respond.

According to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, 42% of those surveyed were either thoroughly confused or had only a rough idea about rental insurance. Thirty-four percent of those surveyed bought a rental car company’s insurance just to make sure they were covered. Thus, a significant number of people are making important decisions without knowing precisely what they are buying or what they are refusing. Needless to say, uninformed decisions involving insurance should be avoided.

Rental car companies typically present their customers with multiple options of additional coverage, including liability insurance, accident insurance, personal effects coverage, and collision damage waiver (CDW). The most common option is the CDW, which is also known as loss damage waiver. While not technically insurance at all, the CDW allows car renters to avoid any financial responsibility if a rental car is stolen or damaged. The CDW may also cover any loss of use fees, which are designed to cover the amount that rental car companies charge customers for every day a damaged or stolen rental car is out of service.

Determining whether any of these options should be purchased from the rental car company depends on each driver’s particular situation. If the correct decision is made, two things will happen: 1) the driver will not have any gaps in coverage, and 2) the driver will not have duplicate coverage. This is accomplished by determining whether any of the benefits offered by a rental car company’s products can be found elsewhere.

  • The most common sources of concurrent coverage for liabilities associated with a rental car are:Personal Automobile Insurance Policy. If a driver is already covered under a comprehensive and collision auto insurance policy, damage to the rental car may very well be covered. Any coverage would be subject to applicable limits, deductibles, and exclusions under the policy. The scope of coverage and any limitations should be confirmed with an insurance agent.
  • Personal Umbrella Liability Policy. A personal umbrella may provide coverage in the event of a loss involving a rental car. Any coverage would be subject to applicable limits, deductibles, and exclusions under the policy. For example, the care, custody, and control exclusion must have an exception for damages to non-owned vehicles that were not required by contract to be covered by insurance. The scope of coverage and any limitations should be confirmed with an insurance agent.
  • Credit Card. If used to pay for the rental car, a driver’s credit card may provide free rental coverage and other associated benefits. The credit card agreement should be reviewed carefully to clarify exactly what may or may not be covered, as well as any conditions to coverage.

In many instances, one or more of these resources may cover most or all of the obligations a driver assumes when he or she signs a rental car agreement. In such cases, rental car insurance, at least in part, would be redundant. Since rental car insurance is rarely free, and is often expensive, there is a strong financial incentive to avoid redundant insurance coverage.

The most important part of this process is confirming the absence of any gaps in coverage. For example, if a personal automobile insurance policy does not provide international coverage, then that policy cannot be relied on for international travel. Also, if a car is being rented for business use, then a personal umbrella may not provide coverage for an occurrence involving the rental car. Identifying coverage gaps requires a good understanding of the insurance policy or credit card agreement relied upon to provide coverage, and the scope of use of the rental vehicle.

Given the consequences of incorrectly expecting coverage under an existing insurance policy, it may be helpful to consult with an insurance professional before deciding whether to purchase or forego rental car insurance. The same recommendation also applies to credit card agreements and the protections afforded to those using the credit card to rent a car. Since rental car insurance products generate revenue for rental car companies, the rental counter may not be the best source of information or guidance.

Avoiding both gaps in coverage and duplicate coverage for potential rental car liability requires effort and inquiry on the part of a driver. However, since the cost of failing to prevent either or both of these situations could be significant, the effort is often justified.

If you have any questions, or if you would like an insurance quote, please contact us.

Would You Like to Stack That?

If you have ever elected to purchase uninsured (or underinsured) motorist (UM) coverage with your automobile insurance policy, you were likely asked if you would like to “stack” the coverage. In many instances, after hearing a brief explanation, many insureds answer the question even though they do not fully grasp the concept of stacking coverages. More importantly, many insureds respond without understanding the significance of their decision.

In an effort to eliminate instances of uninformed stacking decisions, Florida law requires that insureds make their election in writing on a form approved by the Office of Insurance Regulation. In addition to protecting an insured’s interests in this regard, the requirement that insurance companies obtain informed consent confirms the significance of the deciding whether or not to stack UM coverage.

The importance of this decision is further highlighted by its connection to UM coverage. UM coverage applies to bodily injuries to you and your passengers when the other person who caused the accident has no insurance or not enough insurance to cover the claim. While always valuable, the need for UM coverage is even more pronounced during difficult economic times since the number of uninsured and underinsured drivers is usually at its highest. Given the high cost of being involved in an accident with an uninsured or underinsured driver, UM coverage is often described as being one of the most important parts of a comprehensive auto insurance program.

Fortunately, the concept of stacking coverage is fairly straightforward. By taking a few moments to understand the difference between stacked and un-stacked (or non-stacked), an insured can evaluate the differences between the two, which will then allow them to determine which option best suits their particular needs.

Although amounts vary depending on an insured’s choice, insurance polices contain coverage limits which are typically expressed as 10/20 ($10,000 per person / $20,000 per accident), 50/100, 100/300, etc. These numbers represent the limit of what an insurance company will pay in the event of a claim.

Those who purchase UM coverage may be given the option to add, or stack, the limits of coverage, thereby increasing the amount that an insurance company will pay in the event of a claim. When an insured elects to stack the coverage, the limits will increase based on the number of cars that are insured.

Consider the example of an insured that has three vehicles insured under the same policy, and each has a UM limit of 50/100 ($50,000 per person/$100,000 per accident). If the insured elects not to stack the coverage, then these UM limits would not change. However, if the insured does elect to stack the coverage, then the insured will have UM coverage of up to $150,000 per person/$300,000 per accident, which is arrived at by multiplying the number of vehicles by the limits of insurance.

As this example illustrates, electing to stack UM coverage limits can make a big difference in the amount of insurance coverage that is available to an insured for a UM claim. Since choosing to stack coverage operates to increase the available limits, it necessarily follows that the choice will result in higher premiums. However, in many instances the increase is reasonable when compared to the additional coverage. Nevertheless, any increase in cost should be considered.

Additionally, in some cases, stacking coverage may increase the likelihood that the UM policy will respond to a claim whereas the un-stacked policy may not. For example, in some instances, an owner of a car and a motorcycle who elects to stack the auto policy may be covered in the event of a motorcycle accident caused by an uninsured motorist. The same may not be true if the auto policy is un-stacked. So, in addition to increased limits, there may also be an increased response by the stacked policy. Consequentially, since stacking may result in coverage that may not otherwise be available if the UM coverage was un-stacked, many people elect to stack their coverage even if they only have one car.

In many, if not most instances, the recommendation will be to stack the UM coverage regardless of any increase in premium. Nevertheless, it would be wise to make an independent evaluation when it comes to this decision. Understanding the difference between stacked and un-stacked, as well as the ramifications of choosing one over the other, gives an insured all that is needed to make a decision that is best for them.

Finally, when it comes to stacking coverage, state laws may vary significantly depending on the wording of any applicable statutes, judicial interpretations, and insurance policies. Therefore, it is wise to either become familiar with your state’s laws, or alternatively, do business with a reputable and experienced insurance agent.

If you would like more information about personal or commercial automobile insurance, including UM coverage, please contact us.